Former President Trump and conservatives have said they would try to revive Schedule F in a Republican administration.

Former President Trump and conservatives have said they would try to revive Schedule F in a Republican administration. Allison Joyce/Getty Images

Only Two Agencies Had Submitted Their Schedule F Plans for Approval Before Its Rescission, But Several Others Had Begun Work

Officials with the Office of Personnel Management told the Government Accountability Office that it did not issue regulations on the controversial executive order because they wanted to “observe” how agencies would implement it first.

A new report from a congressional watchdog agency sheds light on the Trump administration’s abortive attempt to remove potentially thousands of federal workers in policy-related positions from the competitive civil service and make them at-will employees.

The Government Accountability Office issued a report Wednesday analyzing how agencies worked to implement former President Trump’s Schedule F executive order in the waning days of his administration, until President Biden took office and quickly rescinded the policy edict.

Schedule F called for career federal workers employed in some policy-related positions to be moved into a new job category outside of the competitive service, stripping them of their civil service protections and making them effectively at-will employees. The proposal was heavily criticized by federal employee organizations and good government groups, who warned it would politicize the federal workforce and mark a return of the 19th century spoils system. Conservatives have begun to rally behind the idea again in recent months, with Trump and think tanks signaling they would revive the measure under the next Republican administration.

GAO studied the effort to implement Schedule F between October 2020, when Trump signed the executive order establishing the new job classification, and January 2021, when Biden was inaugurated and rescinded the directive, and spoke with stakeholders both inside and out of government about the plan. The watchdog agency found that only two agencies—the Office of Management and Budget and the U.S. International Boundary and Water Commission—submitted their plans for moving jobs into Schedule F to the Office of Personnel Management for approval, although several other agencies indicated that they were working on their own proposals.

Of the 13 agencies that communicated with OPM about implementation but had not submitted a proposal, seven reported that they needed additional time to analyze positions across their agency, while another six said they either did not have a need for the expedited hiring and firing afforded by Schedule F or did not have any positions that would qualify for the new job category.

In the case of OMB, which was slated to see 68% of its workforce converted to Schedule F, officials there said agency leaders pushed for fast approval of their plan because “then-administration officials wanted OMB to serve as an example for other agencies to follow.” Although OPM approved OMB’s petition on Jan. 8, 2021, the agency ultimately was unable to convert any positions to Schedule F because its HR staff was too busy preparing for the presidential transition, and officials with the Biden administration instructed staff to stop working on the controversial plan on Jan. 20.

Over at the U.S. International Boundary and Water Commission, only five of the agency’s 234 employees were slated to move into Schedule F. The agency submitted its plan on Jan. 19, 2021, and OPM was unable to review the proposal before Biden rescinded the executive order.

Officials at the agency, which applies boundary and water treaties between the U.S. and Mexico, said the expedited hiring and firing offered by Schedule F was appealing to senior leaders, particularly given the location of its offices in remote locations along the southern border.

“Another factor officials noted was the desire to have employees who the commissioner trusted to expeditiously carry out policy decisions,” GAO wrote. “Finally, they said that there was a desire to have the flexibility to quickly remove poorly performing employees rather than wait for them to retire, leave or go through the removal process, which they said was lengthy.”

OPM, for its part, consulted with agencies across a number of venues, such as the Chief Human Capital Officer Council, to answer questions about Schedule F, although several topics remained simply “under consideration,” such as whether employees would immediately lose their civil service protections if converted to the new job classification and how probationary periods would work. Although OPM offered initial guidance for how agencies should submit their proposals to comply with Trump’s executive order, the agency never proposed regulations to formally implement the policy.

“OPM did not issue regulations related to Schedule F before [the executive order] was revoked,” GAO wrote. “OPM officials told us they wanted to observe how agencies implemented Schedule F. This would allow them to understand the common issues agencies faced in implementation before issuing regulations.”

GAO also consulted with more than a dozen stakeholders from both within the Trump administration and from employee groups and academia. Although they agreed in a general sense that it can often take too long to either hire or fire a federal worker, some feared Schedule F would lead to a politicization of jobs that had prioritized nonpartisan expertise.

“One stakeholder said a Schedule F category would be a positive development, as employees in Schedule F positions should be committed to presidential priorities and therefore more motivated to quickly and effectively implement the president’s policy agenda,” GAO wrote. “Some stakeholders, however, stated that this could cause federal employees to be hired for their commitment to the president rather than their competence.”

Those interviewed by GAO also said that Schedule F could hurt the recruitment and retention of federal workers, contributing to a loss of institutional knowledge and expertise over time.

“Several stakeholders said Schedule F could make it more difficult to recruit federal employees, as potential applicants interested in a federal career could be deterred from taking a Schedule F position if they believed they could be removed for political reasons after a change in administration,” GAO wrote. “Several stakeholders told us that Schedule F could result in increased employee turnover between administrations, leading to a lack of continuity and a potential degradation in the overall subject matter expertise held within the civil service.”

In response to a draft of the report, OPM Director Kiran Ahuja and OMB Director Shalanda Young said that the Biden administration remains in “steadfast opposition” to Schedule F.

“Schedule F rested on false and harmful assumptions regarding the effectiveness and merit of the career civil service,” they wrote. “And far from promoting merit-based personnel hiring, we now know that the prior administration sought to use Schedule F as a vehicle for replacing nonpartisan civil servants with individuals hired solely based on their ideological and political beliefs. The American people long ago rejected such a patronage system of federal hiring.”

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.