The Justice Department had already resumed voluntarily recognizing the nearly 50-year-old labor organization.

The Justice Department had already resumed voluntarily recognizing the nearly 50-year-old labor organization. JL Images / iStock.com

Labor Authority Continues Effort to Bust Immigration Judges Union, Without Management Support

It was unclear Monday how the controversial and “unprecedented” decision to decertify the National Association of Immigration Judges would play out, just six weeks after the Justice Department began voluntarily recognizing the labor group again.

The Republican majority on the Federal Labor Relations Authority last week issued an “unprecedented” decision to move forward with busting a union of immigration judges, despite the fact that both the union and management at the Justice Department have asked the decision to be withdrawn.

In a 2-1 decision, the FLRA rejected requests by both the Justice Department’s Executive Office of Immigration Review and the National Association of Immigration Judges to throw out its controversial November 2020 decision decertifying the union.

In that decision, FLRA members appointed by then-President Trump overruled the agency’s regional director and found that immigration judges are management officials and ordered the union’s decertification. The union quickly filed a motion for the FLRA to reconsider the decision, which eventually was endorsed by the Justice Department last December after management resumed voluntarily recognizing the nearly 50-year-old labor organization.

In Friday’s decision, FLRA members Colleen Duffy Kiko and James Abbott accused the union of simply trying to “relitigate” the original decision and publicly criticized the FLRA regional director and acting general counsel for not fully implementing the decision despite the union’s request for reconsideration and a stay in the matter.

“Instead of implementing [the 2020 decision], the regional office took specific actions that not only stymied implementation but also appeared to penalize the agency for its attempt to comply,” they wrote. “Specifically, when the agency refused to negotiate with the union because the bargaining unit consisted of management officials, the regional office, with the approval of the [acting general counsel], filed a consolidated unfair labor practice complaint against the agency . . . Unfortunately, the troubling series of events has allowed the union to continue to act as an exclusive representative for more than a year in contravention of the statute—all while ironically assisted by the statute’s machinery for ensuring compliance with the law.”

Chairman Ernest DuBester, who remains the lone Democrat atop the FLRA while his renomination and that of former Merit Systems Protection Board Chairwoman Susan Tsui Grundmann, who would replace Abbott, have sat idle since being voted out of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in November, issued a dissent under duress after the GOP-appointed members threatened to issue the decision without his participation.

“Although the agency initially filed the underlying petition and opposed the union’s motion for reconsideration of that decision, it has since changed its position—withdrawing its opposition to this motion for reconsideration and seeking to withdraw the very petition that provided the vehicle for the majority to issue its underlying decision,” he wrote. “Of course, my colleagues’ approach should come as no surprise. Over the last four years, they have repeatedly taken action without regard for—or, indeed, even contrary to—the parties’ positions or arguments.”

Mimi Tsankov, president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, said she was outraged at the decision, specifically because it overrules not only labor law precedent, but the wishes of all parties involved in the case. She said the union will continue to fight to overturn the ruling and is deliberating over their next steps in the matter.

“It’s just against the wishes of the parties,” she said. “DOJ and the union of judges have been working together closely since Dec. 7, when we signed a settlement agreement, and even moreover, the DOJ has specifically petitioned the court to withdraw the petition . . . It’s a decision that was issued and we look at it as a decision that is poorly reasoned and fails to consider many of the arguments that we made. It’s against the will of the parties, and that will has been set forth in writing before the FLRA.”

Robert Tobias, distinguished practitioner in residence at American University’s Key Leadership Program and a former president of the National Treasury Employees Union, said he has never seen a case like this in federal labor law.

“It makes no sense from every single perspective that I look at it,” he said. “It should be moot. It should have been moot. But the regional director also should have followed the decision. But the decision itself says nothing and provides no explanation of [members’] reasoning. It’s never happened before, to my knowledge.”

Tobias said that theoretically, the parties involved in the case could continue their relationship and effectively ignore the decision. But any manager, present or under a future administration, could cite the decision and refuse to acknowledge the union as judges’ exclusive representative.

“I think they’re going to have to get a court to decide, although in a bargaining unit case, they ordinarily are not appealable,” he said.

The FLRA declined to comment following multiple requests for information about how the agency plans to decertify a union that is currently being voluntarily recognized by management.

Matt Biggs, national president of the International Federation of Technical and Professional Employees, whose federation includes the judges’ union, said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer shares some blame for the decision, which he argued would not have been issued had Schumer scheduled DuBester and Grundmann’s nominations, as well as the nomination of Kurt Rumsfeld to serve as general counsel, for floor votes.

“It’s outrageous, and it was completely avoidable,” Biggs said. “[There’s] no hold on the nominations, but it’s clear that because the nominations came out of committee on a party-line vote, it was pretty clear that it would require floor time to confirm them. I guess Schumer didn’t want to prioritize this and commit to floor time to getting these nominees through, and that’s a shame. The FLRA is as important to federal employees—and there’s more than 2 million of them—as the [National Labor Relations Board] is to the private sector. Credit to Schumer for moving the NLRB folks, but allowing the FLRA to continue to have a Trump majority has led to the ability of those two Trump appointees to put out a decision based not on the law, but their ideology and disdain for the unions in the federal sector.”

Schumer’s office and the Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.