Ashley Tabaddor, a federal immigration judge in Los Angeles and president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, blasted the decision and the administration's "all out assault" on unions.

Ashley Tabaddor, a federal immigration judge in Los Angeles and president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, blasted the decision and the administration's "all out assault" on unions. AP file photo

FLRA Overturns Its Own Regional Director, Busts Immigration Judges’ Union

The lone Democrat on the board of the agency tasked with administering federal labor law accused his colleagues of “sophistry” and “facetious” reasoning to strip more than 450 federal employees of their collective bargaining rights.

The Federal Labor Relations Authority this week overruled the findings of its regional director and concluded that immigration judges in the Justice Department’s Executive Office of Immigration Review are management officials, stripping more than 450 federal employees of their collective bargaining rights.

Last year, the Justice Department announced that it would seek to decertify the vocal National Association of Immigration Judges, arguing that circumstances had changed since the FLRA last reviewed—and affirmed—that the judges are eligible to form a union in 2000. The agency argued that although immigration judges’ duties remain entirely nonsupervisory in nature, changes to how the Board of Immigration Appeals may review their decisions elevate their work to influencing agency policy, making them management officials.

FLRA D.C. Regional Director Jessica Bartlett rejected those arguments in August, finding that the recent increase in deference in terms of immigration judges’ factual findings does not rise to the level of converting judges into management officials.

But after the Justice Department asked the FLRA board to review the decision, its Republican majority chose to overrule the regional director, despite finding little fault in her reasoning. In a decision dated Nov. 2 but published to the labor agency’s website on Tuesday, FLRA Chairwoman Colleen Kiko Duffy and Member James Abbott instead “reevaluated” the FLRA’s 2000 decision that first affirmed immigration judges’ right to bargain collectively.

“The agency argues that EOIR 2000 needs to be reconsidered because it is in conflict with U.S. DOJ, Board of Immigration Appeals. We agree,” the majority wrote. “[The] authority in EOIR 2000 failed to recognize the significance of IJ decisions and how those decisions influence agency policy. IJ decisions influence the policy of the agency for similar reasons that [Board of Immigration Appeals] member decisions influence the policy of the agency.”

Although the FLRA admitted that it effectively re-evaluating its 2000 decision allowing immigration judges to unionize, it argued that it was not breaking its own rules against so-called “collateral attacks” against a bargaining unit’s certification because the union did not appeal the regional director’s initial decision that the recent changes to how the Board of Immigration Appeals may review their decisions constitutes as “substantial change” to their duties.

“Initially, we note that the RD found that a substantial change existed in this case, and that the existence of a substantial change required a ‘thorough reassessment’ of the IJ’s status as management officials,” the FLRA wrote. “Further, the union did not file an application for review to challenge either of those findings. Therefore, we may evaluate the merits of the agency’s arguments regarding the appropriateness of the unit without running afoul of the bar on collaterally attacking a previous unit certification.”

In an email to members Tuesday, National Association of Immigration Judges President Ashley Tabaddor vowed to fight the decision using all available legal avenues. Decisions by the FLRA may be appealed to federal circuit courts.

"We are outraged, though not surprised by the lack of legal analysis [in the decision]," she wrote. "This decision is not being rendered in a vacuum. We have suffered an all-out assault on labor and unions from the outset of three executive orders designed to decimate bargaining rights of unions and the most recent executive order designed to transform the federal workforce into an 'at-will' and deeply politicized body . . . We have lost this battle, but we will win the war."

Ernest DuBester, the lone Democratic member of the FLRA, issued a scathing dissent to the ruling, accusing his colleagues of engaging in “sophistry” to justify decertifying a union.

“In an act of legal gymnastics, the majority decides it may reconsider our decision in [EOIR 2000]—the very decision in which the authority determined that the IJs were not management officials—because the union did not file an application for review to challenge the RD’s findings regarding the substantial change,” DuBester wrote. “Leaving aside the question of why the union would seek review of a decision denying the agency’s petition, it is entirely unclear how its failure in this regard opens the door to what is essentially a collateral attack on our decision in EOIR.

DuBester argued that the majority’s reasoning—that both immigration judges and Board of Immigration Appeals members “influence” policy through their decision making—falls short because it fails to take into account the actual differences between the two positions.

“The majority is simply incorrect that we failed to recognize the significance of the IJs’ decisions in [EOIR 2000],” he wrote. “But more fundamentally, the majority does not even attempt to reconcile its conclusion with longstanding authority precedent applying the management-official exclusion, including the decisions upon which the RD relied and the decisions upon which we relied in [previous cases]. And the majority’s analysis entirely ignores the critical distinctions the authority carefully drew between the authority possessed by the IJs and the board members to bind the agency with respect to its policies.”

Returning to a theme of his most recent dissents, DuBester went so far as to accuse his colleagues of twisting the law and FLRA rules to meet their predetermined conclusion.

“This is the antithesis of reasoned decision making,” he wrote. “Based upon the conclusory nature of the majority’s analysis, along with the facetious manner in which it reconciles its decision with authority precedent precluding collateral attacks on unit certifications, it is abundantly clear that the majority’s sole objective is to divest the IJs of their statutory rights. Once again, I refuse to join a decision ‘so fundamentally adverse to the principles and purposes of our statute.”

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.