House approves transparency bill, citing GSA scandal

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif. National Journal file photo

The House on Wednesday by voice vote approved the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act to increase transparency on federal agency spending, with speakers on the floor repeatedly invoking the recent spending scandal at the General Services Administration.

The legislation known as the DATA Act (H.R. 2146) would impose a universal reporting requirement for recipients of federal grants, loans and contracts, while requiring all agencies to use the same formats to publicly share their internal and external obligations and expenditures. In addition, a late amendment would curb agency spending on conferences.

Support for the House legislation was bipartisan, with Republicans and Democrats both blasting the recently revealed $820,000 Las Vegas conference held by GSA’s Western Regions in October 2010. Support in the Senate appears more limited.

The agency’s conference funding was “cobbled together from different baskets of money, so GSA officials could have family vacations,” said the act’s chief sponsor, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Neither the staff of his committee nor the inspectors general alone can protect the American taxpayer against wasteful spending, he added, which is why the bill’s approach of “recipient reporting” is needed.

Issa thanked various open-government groups for their help in shaping the bill, as well as Vice President Joe Biden and retired Recovery Board Chairman Earl Devaney, whose website served as a model for the Accountability Act’s approach to tracking spending.

The committee’s ranking minority member, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., also commended the bipartisan effort, noting some of the bill’s provisions echo President Obama’s executive orders to curb waste and reduce agency spending on travel. Cummings also praised colleagues for accepting changes in the bill, which originally was introduced in June 2011.

One of the two dozen transparency advocacy groups that backed the bill, the nonprofit OMBWatch, said in an analysis that it switched its stance from opposition to support for the bill once provisions were removed that would have repealed an earlier transparency law, the 2006 Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, and another that would have required a more restrictive “sunset” of DATA.

After the legislation was approved under suspension of the rules, OMBWatch President Katherine McFate said the vote “represents a bipartisan congressional commitment to new levels of government openness. In the coming years, our nation will be facing tough choices about how we spend precious public dollars. The DATA Act is a critical first step toward ensuring that every citizen has the information he or she needs to understand the choices our public officials make while investing public resources.”

One of the act’s key champions, Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Fla., warned on the House floor that the bill “sends a clear message to bureaucrats in Washington that the American public is watching and demands accountability.” Ross on Tuesday introduced a bill (H.R. 4472) to reduce the travel budgets of every federal agency by half next fiscal year, and more in subsequent years, while requiring more detailed reports of their travel spending to congressional committees.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.