Retirement Planning Retirement PlanningRetirement Planning
Advice on how to prepare for life after government.

Phased Retirement Q&A


Last month, I wrote about the new phased retirement option for federal employees, enabling them to work part time while they start to draw retirement benefits.

That column sparked a series of questions and comments about how the new provision will be implemented. I thought I’d tackle some of them this week.

Will the phased retirement also forestall required minimum distributions from the Thrift Savings Plan?

My associate, Bob Leins (a certified public accountant with NITP Inc.), posed this question to TSP officials and they pointed him to a section of the law that enacted the phased retirement option, which states that for certain defined purposes, “a phased retiree shall be deemed to be an employee.”

According to the TSP, this means no employee is entitled to treat phased retirement as a separation for plan withdrawal purposes. That in turn means employees will not be subject to required minimum distributions (which are compulsory after participants are age 70 ½ and retired) until they are fully retired.

Employees in phased retirement can continue to make contributions to the TSP and are eligible to make any withdrawals they are allowed to make as employees (whether age-based or due to financial hardship). Also, employees in phased retirement will remain eligible to receive TSP loans and to repay them through payroll deduction. If an employee has a TSP loan upon entering phased retirement status, he or she will not have to prepay the loan, nor will it be declared a taxable distribution.

Could the phased retiree qualify for a Federal Employees Retirement System supplement? If so, would it be prorated?

I’m not sure on this one yet, but since the FERS supplement is tested for outside earnings, it most likely would be reduced to nothing as a result of the partial earnings of the phased retiree.

The earnings limit is $14,640 for 2012. The supplement is reduced by $1 for every $2 earned above this limit. So if a phased retiree was receiving 50 percent of a $70,000 salary ($35,000), this would be $20,360 above the earnings limit and would reduce the supplement by more than $10,000 -- most likely eliminating it altogether. The supplement is worth approximately $35-$40 per month for every year worked as a civilian federal employee under FERS. Thirty years of service would provide a supplement of around $1,200 a month. If it was paid at 50 percent, it would be cut to $600, whereupon the earnings limit would reduce it to zero.

What's good for the government is not always good for the employee. A retirement-eligible worker with 36 years of service and making $80,000 per year is eligible to receive roughly $56,000 in retirement pay if fully retired. An employee taking half-time phased retirement would get $28,000 (half retirement pay) and $40,000 (half of regular salary) for a total of $68,000, which is $12,000 more than collecting full retirement. That means the employee is earning $11.50/per hour ($12,000 divided by 1,040 hours) for the part-time work for which he or she was paid $38.40 per hour while fully employed. I don’t think many employees will take the offer to get paid roughly 30 cents on the dollar for the same work. No wonder the bill was passed. It’s another no-win for the employee.

I see what you’re saying, but the reasons for taking a phased retirement would be more comprehensive than just looking at the difference between one’s full retirement benefit and the amount being paid for partial retirement and partial salary. Even employees who continue to work full time when they are eligible for retirement are working for the difference between their retirement benefit and their full salary. Yet many continue to do so because they can increase the amount of their lifetime retirement benefit and make additional contributions to the Thrift Savings Plan. This allows them to have a more comfortable retirement once they make the decision to fully retire.

Sometimes, a partial retirement can make the mental transition to full retirement a little easier on the employee. Kevin Cahill, a research economist, has written an article called “Thinking About Phased Retirement?” that explores some of the benefits of the phased approach.

I predict phased retirement will not be popular and little used.

Have ye no faith, my friend? My prediction is the option will be welcomed by many federal employees who are eligible to retire, but just not ready to jump in head first. I’ve been polling people at my preretirement seminars, and in most cases I’m getting a better than 50 percent favorable response to the idea.


Tammy Flanagan has spent 30 years helping federal employees take charge of their retirement by understanding their benefits. She runs her own consulting business at and provides individual counseling as well as online training for the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, Plan Your Federal Retirement as well as the Federal Long Term Care insurance Program. She also serves as the senior benefits director for the National Institute of Transition Planning Inc., which conducts federal retirement planning workshops and seminars.

For more retirement planning help, tune in to "For Your Benefit," presented by the National Institute of Transition Planning Inc. live on Federal News Radio on Mondays at 10 a.m. ET on WFED AM 1500 in the Washington-metro area. Archived shows are available on

Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.