Almost Nobody's Happy Even Though the House Acted on Budget Deal

Outgoing House Speaker John Boehner addresses the chamber on Thursday. Outgoing House Speaker John Boehner addresses the chamber on Thursday. Andrew Harnik/AP

For weeks, the House was le­gis­lat­ively para­lyzed as con­ser­vat­ives battled the Re­pub­lic­an es­tab­lish­ment over the fu­ture of the party. This week, the House be­came un­stuck, and yet al­most no long-term work is fin­ished and al­most no one was left happy with the res­ults.

Speak­er John Boehner’s last week in of­fice saw a bizarre flurry of le­gis­lat­ive activ­ity on long-stalled is­sues: A re­new­al of the Ex­port-Im­port Bank’s charter passed over the ob­jec­tions of the Fin­an­cial Ser­vices Com­mit­tee chair­man, a bi­par­tis­an deal in­creas­ing the budget passed over the ob­jec­tions of the Budget Com­mit­tee chair­man, and a party lead­er was pushed in­to the speak­er­ship over his own ob­jec­tions, not to men­tion the ob­jec­tions of scores of hard-line Re­pub­lic­ans.

And yet, none of this re­solved the un­der­ly­ing de­bates that have split the party, but rather just put them off. And, para­dox­ic­ally, the main reas­on any of it moved was be­cause Boehner was on the cusp of resign­ing, es­sen­tially pushed out by the same forces he pushed out of the way to cut his fi­nal deal, a two-year budget agree­ment that passed the House Wed­nes­day without a ma­jor­ity of Re­pub­lic­ans.

Con­ser­vat­ives may have claimed his head, but the body let out a last kick.

“Well, the barn’s clean, isn’t it?” said Rep. Mick Mul­vaney, a House Free­dom Caucus mem­ber, para­phras­ing Boehner’s de­scrip­tion of his de­sire to clean house be­fore leav­ing. “John goes out the same way he was when I got here, which is vi­ol­at­ing the Hastert Rule and spend­ing more money.”

Re­pub­lic­an cent­rists, of course, see it much dif­fer­ently. Long frus­trated by the sty­mied le­gis­lat­ive pro­cess, they be­lieve con­ser­vat­ives boxed them­selves in, mak­ing de­mands for budget cuts and phas­ing out the Ex­port-Im­port Bank that could not ul­ti­mately hold.

“I would say it was a good week for those of us who want to gov­ern and a tough week for those who don’t,” said Rep. Charlie Dent, a lead­er in the cent­rist Tues­day Group.

Dent said Boehner’s exit was the only reas­on he and his col­leagues moved on a dis­charge pe­ti­tion, an ex­tremely rare le­gis­lat­ive man­euver that al­lowed mem­bers to wrestle the Ex-Im Bank from Fin­an­cial Ser­vices Chair­man Jeb Hensarling’s jur­is­dic­tion and put it on the House floor for a vote.

“This has been a very un­usu­al time, no ques­tion about it. Or­din­ar­ily, we wouldn’t do a dis­charge pe­ti­tion, but we got a hall pass,” Dent said. “When the speak­er de­cided he was go­ing to leave, that’s when the dis­charge pe­ti­tion was put in mo­tion. Many of us were get­ting tired of a minor­ity in the Re­pub­lic­an Party us­ing their po­s­i­tions to ob­struct im­port­ant bills from be­ing con­sidered.”

Still, even some who vote with lead­er­ship reg­u­larly would have liked to see an­oth­er out­come. Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Kev­in Mc­Carthy and Ma­jor­ity Whip Steve Scal­ise both fa­vor do­ing away with the lend­ing in­sti­tu­tion. Rep. Dev­in Nunes said he would have liked to in­cre­ment­ally phase it out, and yet he is now left with little to show for it.

“As someone who wanted to get rid of the bank, I get noth­ing,” he said. “I think it shows a little bit of the prob­lem here is if you try to get all or noth­ing, you get noth­ing. People need to real­ize, with a Demo­crat­ic pres­id­ent, we need to stake out po­s­i­tions where we can make in­cre­ment­al im­prove­ment to the con­ser­vat­ive agenda.”

And while the House may have passed it, the is­sue is likely to re­sur­face as Con­gress looks at a mul­ti­year high­way reau­thor­iz­a­tion, giv­ing con­ser­vat­ives an­oth­er po­ten­tial chance to keep the bank shuttered.

Those who voted for the budget deal were left sim­il­arly un­ful­filled. To be sure, it averts what could be a dis­aster if the debt lim­it is not raised. But al­most every mem­ber in the end said it was an im­per­fect deal for which they had to hold their noses and vote “yea.”

“Some of the is­sues give me heart­burn, but we are mov­ing for­ward,” Rep. Mario Diaz-Bal­art said. “The Amer­ic­an people ex­pect us to gov­ern, and I think what you’re see­ing now is the House mov­ing for­ward, frankly, on big is­sues—im­per­fect, some­times ugly, but mov­ing for­ward based on con­ser­vat­ive prin­ciples.”

Still, more fights will come when the deal gets im­ple­men­ted: House ap­pro­pri­at­ors will have to craft a massive om­ni­bus bill by Dec. 11, which is sure to re­sur­rect the same pro­ced­ur­al ob­jec­tions the budget deal faced. The fisc­al year 2017 ap­pro­pri­ations pro­cess, mean­while, will be full of the usu­al spend­ing-rider land mines, des­pite an agree­ment on a top-line num­ber.

The point of all this last-minute activ­ity for Boehner was to hand Ry­an a clean slate. Yet even if the next speak­er comes in with few­er dead­lines to meet, he has already earned some fresh sus­pi­cion from con­ser­vat­ives un­happy that he backed the budget deal. And now they’ll be watch­ing closely to see what oth­er com­prom­ises he might make.

Con­ser­vat­ives scored a vic­tory by block­ing the path for Mc­Carthy. They also ex­trac­ted prom­ises from Ry­an, like a pledge to en­act pro­ced­ur­al re­forms and not to al­low im­mig­ra­tion re­form to move for­ward without a ma­jor­ity of Re­pub­lic­ans in fa­vor.

But the can­did­ate they sought, Rep. Daniel Web­ster, lost hand­ily. Ry­an, mean­while, is a can­did­ate to whom they could not say no: someone with the cult of per­son­al­ity and con­ser­vat­ive bona fides to brush away ob­jec­tions as not cred­ible, but who not two years ago struck a deal al­most identic­al to Boehner’s budget deal and will most likely strike more.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec