insta_photos / istock

Human Capital Execs Are ‘Resigned’ to Operating Around a Failed HR System

Looking to the future, the GS system will be a barrier to rebuilding a federal workforce with essential expertise.

Recently I had a chance to participate in a panel discussion of human capital reform along with two senior HR executives. Each of us had 15 minutes and the session concluded with a Q and A discussion. Both did an excellent job of outlining ongoing initiatives and strategies to address staffing issues. 

In listening to the first speaker, it struck me that at no time did she mention the General Schedule and federal pay. I made that point as a question in my opening comments. In a sidebar conversation with the panelists, the answer was striking: They are “resigned”—their word—to working around what is obviously a failed pay system. They see no hope of addressing federal pay problems and that has implications for adding the talent needed to tackle critical national concerns.

Cybersecurity gets the attention but there are a number of other complex problems where agencies need true experts. Imagine where the country would be if the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did not have experts in dealing with infectious diseases. To deal with climate change, NOAA needs experts. Most agencies have a similar need for experts. This is not the 1940s.  

Looking to the future, the GS system will be a barrier to rebuilding a workforce with essential expertise.  

Focusing on the Value of Employee Capabilities

A thread that runs through the reports of the Federal Salary Council is the idea that employees can and should be managed as a cost. Council reports showing payroll cost increases reflect that management philosophy. That thinking is also apparent in statements by members of Congress.

In the 1930s, when employees competed for jobs at the lowest wage level, holding down wages and reducing labor costs was a common management goal. It was central to the reason unions became powerful. It also triggered support for minimum wage laws.  

There is a contrary argument, however, that flows from the research on high performance organizations and in the logic of naming the “great places to work.” The best performing companies see building workforce capabilities as an investment.

Today, with talent shortages, employers are forced to adjust pay levels to stay competitive. A year ago the idea of a $15 minimum wage was only supported by progressives; now it’s the norm in many parts of the country.  

There are companies that elect to pay above average salaries; assuming higher salaries will increase the applications from better qualified candidates. Highly qualified new hires have the potential to perform at higher levels. The best performers are paid more in virtually every field.

The rapid growth in knowledge jobs—those where expertise is important—has triggered a revolution in the way many workers are managed. In those roles, employees function with a great deal of autonomy; many are essentially self-managed. The pandemic and working remotely made self-management the norm for millions of workers.  

This “new normal” work experience requires a high level of mutual trust. It also requires open communication to discuss goals and problems. It is most successful when employees know they are expected to collaborate and make job-related decisions. That’s the basis for a performance culture.

Imagine what that could mean to government. Layers of management could be eliminated. Fewer employees would be needed. A highly qualified, empowered workforce could actually reduce costs.

Former Comptroller General David Walker stated the argument succinctly: “Federal employees represent an asset that needs to be valued, not a cost that needs to be cut.”

The pandemic confirmed the value of staff expertise. Those “heroes work here” signs make it clear that employees are more than a cost.

Pay is Central in Competing for Talent

In every other sector an employer’s compensation strategy is central to competing for talent, especially for scarce or high demand skills. Articles on what’s important to job seekers are often silent on starting salary because salary offers, with rare exceptions, are within a narrow range. Further, high performers expect to be recognized and rewarded. Pay increases are the most common tool for recognizing employee value.  

Salary planning is not a hot HR topic but it's basic. Annual market analyses and planning adjustments to remain competitive are discussed in every HR textbook. Employers that want to attract above average talent pay above average salaries. That’s straight out of microeconomic theory.  

No employer—government is the exception—would knowingly maintain below market salaries. That has clear ramifications for the caliber of applicants as well as employee engagement and retention.

Government’s core problem is the statutory requirement that only Bureau of Labor Statistics surveys can be used to monitor market pay levels. Their methodology was not planned to compare the pay of federal employees with their private sector counterparts. Especially important, their surveys ignore the starting salaries in those high demand fields. BLS data fails to show the jobs where pay levels are below market.  

But that’s not the only problem. The GS system is administered as if it exists in a vacuum. Job vacancies are ignored; the local availability of qualified talent is ignored; barriers to commuting are ignored; the mix of local employers is ignored; local market practices like signing bonuses are ignored. The only information that’s relevant? The BLS data.

When federal pay is low, OPM can authorize special pay rates but then those employees are locked into the same treadmill of scheduled step increases. It’s hardly the answer to attract and retain the best talent.

Yes, Total Compensation is Relevant

Recent Federal Salary Council reports have discussed switching the analysis to total compensation. That followed from a 2017 Congressional Budget Office report that argued the higher costs of federal benefits should be considered in planning cash compensation levels: “Overall, the federal government paid 17 percent more in total compensation than it would have if average compensation had been comparable with that in the private sector.” Both claim private employers rely on total compensation.

That is true. Companies need to keep their operating costs in line with their direct competitors, and payroll costs are one of the largest budget items.

However, both the Council and CBO report arguments are flawed: 

1.  Corporations deduct payroll expenses which reduces the net cost of pay and benefits.  

2.  The federal workforce is older than average which drives up the costs. But government’s problem is attracting talented young applicants. The CBO logic would reduce salaries.

3.  BLS data do not include incentive payments along with income from stock options, which for managers and professionals can add at least 10% to their compensation. It's erroneous to argue for including benefit costs but ignore income from incentives and stock appreciation.

4.  The practice in the private sector is for companies to compare pay and benefits with their direct talent competitors, normally in the same industry. The Federal Wage Scale is based on that logic. Government is not competing with the thousands of mom-and-pop businesses represented in BLS surveys.

The GS System is a Problem

Pay reform has been recommended countless times, going back to at least 1972 when a task force studied options for upgrading the government's classification and pay systems. That was a half century ago. The work management paradigm is vastly different today.

But a proven program option was developed less than a decade later. That is the salary band model first introduced in the China Lake demonstration program in 1980. Banded systems have since proven to be a better answer in a number of agencies. The flexibility enables agencies to compete for qualified talent.

Pay reform initiatives have been evaluated and discussed in reports by the National Academy for Public Administration, the Government Accountability Office and OPM. A 2003 NAPA report, Broadband Pay Experience in the Public Sector, reported:

  • Implementation of pay-for-performance increases job satisfaction.
  • Increases in individual effort and motivation were found.
  • The flexibility was helpful in attracting and retaining talent.
  • There was no overall negative impact.
  • Pay satisfaction increased.

The failure of the National Security Personnel System came later.  It ran for roughly five years. While it was ended by Congress in 2009, observers at the time argued that the Defense Department’s “insistence on radical changes to labor relations and employees appeals systems” along with President Obama’s election and the change of control in Congress were important in its demise. Employees satisfaction with the way their pay and performance were managed showed the NSPS was better than the GS system.

The silence on the problems attributable to the GS system is understandable but change is needed. The current focus on cybersecurity staffing problems is the proverbial tip of an iceberg. The House hearings in February, “Revitalizing the Federal Workforce,” made that clear.

The problems are most acute for the high demand STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) occupations. It's not coincidental that those occupations were prominent in several demos.  

It’s clear that the GS system is the wrong answer for these job families. The static nature of the GS system as well as the tenure based pay increases are out of sync with competitive practices.

Given the importance and the staffing problems with STEM job families, the development of a new pay and performance system based on salary bands would be a solid strategy to develop a prototype that could replace the GS system. There is a solid track record of successful reform initiatives and broad recognition that the GS system is a barrier to staffing these critical jobs. The planning should start soon.

NEXT STORY: Analysis: The Bobblehead Dilemma

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.