James Sherk, a former White House advisor during the Trump administration, advocates removing civil service protections for federal employees to make it easier to fire poor performers.

James Sherk, a former White House advisor during the Trump administration, advocates removing civil service protections for federal employees to make it easier to fire poor performers. The C. Boyden Gray Center at George Mason University

Report Calling for At-Will Federal Employment Suggests Trump Workforce Policy Isn’t Going Anywhere

Experts say the release of a controversial paper advocating at-will employment for federal workers portends future efforts to strip employees of civil service protections.

A Trump-aligned think tank issued a report last month defending the former president’s workforce policies and advocating for the federal government to convert to at-will employment, leading experts to warn about the potential for a return of policies like Schedule F in future Republican administrations.

The America First Policy Institute, founded by a group of Trump administration alumni and chaired by former Small Business Administrator Linda McMahon, published a report entitled Increasing Accountability in the Civil Service on May 26. The document is written by former Domestic Policy Council member and White House advisor James Sherk, who shaped many of Trump’s federal workforce and labor policies.

The 19-page report argues that converting the federal workforce to at-will employment—where employees can be fired without cause—is necessary to solve longstanding complaints about the difficulty in dealing with poor performers, and that fears among employee groups, good government organizations and public administration experts that such a move would invite a return of the 19th century spoils system are based on a misunderstanding of the 1883 Pendleton Act.

“Federal job protections are not necessary to run a professional, apolitical civil service,” Sherk wrote. “The federal civil service system operated for six decades with minimal restrictions on firing. More recently, several states have adopted at-will employment. These states continue to operate effective and professional civil services at-will.”

In an interview with Government Executive, Sherk acknowledged that stripping federal workers of most of their current removal protections could make it harder for them to challenge unwarranted personnel actions, be they motivated by politics, discrimination or personal favoritism. But he argued dealing with poor performers is more important.

“Basically the dial has gone haywire, and that’s evidenced by the fact that feds themselves think it’s way too hard to fire people,” he said. “[The original] civil service reformers said, ‘Sure, you’ll have some removals based on animus and passion, but there's no law that can stop a grudge, and it’s not worth sealing up incompetence and insubordination.”

Although experts conceded that the report is among the most thoroughly researched efforts to justify returning to at-will employment in the federal government, they said it is still misguided. Don Kettl, who recently retired as the Sid Richard Professor at the University of Texas at Austin’s Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, said Sherk’s contention that the reforms of the Pendleton Act are divorced from the removal protections developed during the 20th century glosses over nearly half a century of history.

“To cast an interpretation of today’s events solely in terms of the originating act is to make a huge mistake,” Kettl said. “It’s one thing to go back and talk about the Pendleton Act itself, but so much of what happened after that happened gradually and steadily . . . The paper seems to suggest that the original piece of civil service reform was the Pendleton Act, and then fast forwards to veterans protection measures [after World War II], but there was a lot that happened in between. What happened had to do a lot with providing stronger protections to civil servants, to make it more difficult to fire people, in large part because the progressive movement focused increasingly on protecting the roles of individuals and federal officials from political interference and pressure.”

Robert Tobias, a distinguished practitioner in residence at American University’s Key Leadership Program and former president of the National Treasury Employees Union, noted that studies of Georgia found that the removal of poor performers did not increase following the state’s transition to at-will employment in the 1990s.

“The reason for this is because the issue of discharge is very personal between the supervisor and the employee,” Tobias said. “If I’m not skilled at setting standards or at having difficult conversations and dealing with a poor performer, it doesn’t matter if it’s at-will or for cause. I’m not going to issue a discharge action. That, I believe, is the central issue in performance management. Do managers have the skill to set the standards, to have conversations when the standards are not being upheld, and then take action if someone doesn’t conform? That’s hard and, for most people, uncomfortable work. It’s not statute-limiting, it’s personal-limiting.”

Sherk had a simple response to the nearly unanimous opposition to the Trump administration’s limited effort to move toward at-will employment in the form of Schedule F. That initiative, which was aborted before it could be implemented when President Biden entered office, sought to strip the civil service protections of potentially thousands of federal employees in “confidential, policy-determining, policy-making and policy-advocating positions.”

“My reaction is that people are resistant to change or doing anything different,” he said. “People get comfortable in the systems they’re in, so the notion of change can be scary for people.”

Kettl said Sherk’s report should serve as a warning to policymakers who may have been inclined to believe efforts like Schedule F died when Trump lost reelection last year.

“This certainly means that the debate over Schedule F is far from over,” Kettl said. “There are two important hints there. There are references to firing at-will in state and local governments, even as Democrats have control over [the Office of Personnel Management] and the White House now, and since Republicans have a stronger base in some states, you’ll see more efforts in state and local governments to move to at-will employment. That, in turn, will provide an impetus for changes at the federal level . . . The case for Schedule F and resuscitating it in the future is being laid here on the foundation that Mr. Sherk is setting, and it’s clear that if Republicans take control of the White House again they’ll be back with a new version.”

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.