sangeri / istock

The Foundation of the GS System Has Become a Sham

The failure of the job classification system affects every HR practice and puts billions of dollars in payroll in question.

The Government Accountability Office in 2001 added strategic human capital management to its list of high risk programs in need of broad reform, a distinction it has retained for two decades. What’s more, auditors noted in their 2021 ranking that it was one of five areas that had “regressed” since the previous assessment in 2019.  

In a 2020 letter to the Office of Personnel Management, U.S. Comptroller General Gene Dodaro made the point that OPM “had 84 open recommendations.” Further, the agency had implemented only three of 18 open priority recommendations. Those recommendations fall into six areas, including improving the federal classification system: 

“Almost since the General Schedule (GS) system was established in 1949, questions have been raised about its ability to keep pace with the evolving nature of government work. Our July 2014 report [recommended that OPM] … examine ways to make the GS system's design and implementation more consistent with the attributes of a modern, effective classification system.” 

Understanding Job Classification

GAO was being polite. When a system is no longer managed as intended, and problems affect an organization’s performance, it needs to be replaced. Since job classification directly controls or influences every HR practice, its failure has broad implications for workforce management. It also affects careers and family incomes. Consider that:

  • Job classification was originally conceived to control salary grades and therefore the pay of GS jobs. But OPM has no way of confirming jobs are graded accurately. “Grade creep” or over grading has been an acknowledged problem for years. That puts billions of payroll dollars in question. Plus, grades and salaries influence the accrual and the costs of benefits.  
  • President Biden’s renewed focus on pay equity should trigger a concern with how female dominated jobs are classified.
  • Grade level decisions control starting salaries as well as special rates. Both play an important role in recruiting. Grades also control the funds available for recruiting, retention and relocation incentives. There have been no studies to assess the impact of those decisions on staffing or on the skills shortages.  
  • The class standards define career ladders and promotion opportunities, influence performance expectations, training and development opportunities, and provide the framework for workforce planning and skills analyses.  
  • The system and an abbreviated version of the Factor Evaluation System also play a central role in Bureau of Labor Statistics salary surveys. The gap analysis methodology precludes understanding if jobs are paid competitively.

It’s not an over statement to argue that 1) any 1949 “system” or practice that has remained largely unchanged is badly outmoded; and 2) the system affects virtually every federal people management practice. Digging into the classification system makes it all too clear it is antiquated, has lost credibility, and there is no reason to expect the problems will be resolved with current approaches.  

A simple way to assess the validity of the system is to look at the dates on the first page of the class standards. One that stands out after the past year is “Public Health Program Specialist Series, GS-0685, issued November 1980.” Three other prominent job series also stand out: General Attorney Series, 1974; Contracting Series, 1983; and Intelligence Series, 1960. 

The standard for professional work in the Physical Science Group was developed in 1997. It covers 18 fields from Astronomy & Space Science to Land Surveying. Further complicating the classification of the jobs in these fields needs to take into account four other classification documents: the Research Grade Evaluation Guide, the Equipment Development Grade Evaluation Guide, the Test and Evaluation Grade Evaluation Guide, and the Research Grants Grade Evaluation Guide. For supervisors, there is also the General Schedule Supervisory Guide.  

The descriptions of the work of employees in each series are also telling. For example, the standard for: “Grade Level Guide for Clerical and Assistance Work” (1989) covers “tasks related to processing actions, records, data, or other information”: 

“In most cases, the clerical and assistance tasks represent the primary purpose of the job; and the keyboard and computer operation tasks are necessary but incidental means to carry out the work … NOTE: Clerical and assistance work as covered by this guide will often include the use of typewriters, word processors, computer terminals, or personal computers as tools in completing tasks.” 

Blue collar jobs are classified under the separate Federal Wage System Job Grading System.

This is all the purview of HR generalists or small consulting firms since the specialists—”classifiers”—retired years ago. There was at one time a Classification and Compensation Society to provide a patina of professionalism but it disappeared nearly two decades ago. 

The story of the first personnel demonstration project, China Lake, is relevant. It involved the merger of two Naval research labs. The HR manager told the commanding officer it would take two years to reclassify the jobs in the new organization. That was unacceptable to the commanding officer, who insisted that HR find a better answer. The answer was replacing the GS system with a simplified set of salary bands, a response that changed the field of salary management.

Today there is no way to know or even estimate how many jobs are accurately classified, something OPM acknowledges. From the Dodaro letter: “OPM officials said OPM has not reviewed any agency's classification program since the 1980s because OPM leadership at the time concluded the reviews were ineffective and time consuming. As a result, OPM has limited assurance that agencies are correctly classifying positions according to standards.” In any other organization that would be shocking but here it's not surprising.

Jobs are not static. Duties change, new systems are adopted and incumbents are expected to master new skills. OPM’s website still mentions “desk audits” as a service to confirm grade accuracy; but it’s doubtful OPM has the capability.

OPM is stuck between the proverbial rock and hard place. Its mandate is to administer the GS system as prescribed in statutes, starting with the Classification Act of 1949. In those post war years no one could have anticipated the revolution in the way work and careers are managed, or the emergence of new job specialties like cybersecurity. The approach to classification was no doubt appropriate for that era. But now the system has proven impossible to keep updated and is an impediment to talent management. It also undermines OPM’s credibility.  

Related GAO Recommendations

Going forward, two additional GAO recommendations from the 2019 Dodaro letter are linked to the GS system:  

  • Establish a process to collect governmentwide staffing and competency data as a step in closing the critical skills gap, and
  • Analyze the effectiveness of the special pay authority to improve recruitment and retention.

Salaries and the way salaries are administered are central to both concerns. In other sectors, when staffing problems emerge, one of the first steps would be conducting a market analysis to determine if pay is contributing to the problem. For some reason, OPM seems to resist developing job-specific market data. Special rates may initially help to attract talent but new hires quickly learn their salary will follow the GS annual increase pattern. 

A fourth recommendation is also linked to the need for governmentwide staffing and competency data and the “modern, effective classification system.” It’s the need for “enterprise technological solutions to assist the federal human capital community with human capital analysis.”  

Technology is the key to updating the classification system as well as other human capital practices where job or incumbent information is needed. It was more than three decades ago that computers were first used for job evaluation, the private sector version of classification. In response to the demands for comparable worth in the 1980s, HR consulting firms developed largely automated systems based on multiple regression models that excluded the possibility that gender could affect the grade assignment. A version was developed for government, based on the Factor Evaluation System, but apparently it never gained acceptance. 

Current Job Information is Essential

Job classification cries out for automation. The time-honored—or dishonored—practice relied on interviewing incumbents to understand and document their job duties. Group interviews save time but it’s still extremely time consuming and costly. And not reliable since employees have obvious reasons to overstate what they do. If 10 HR analysts study the same job, the result is 10 different job descriptions.

Then if the focus shifts to job skills or competencies, or to any job information, the documentation process starts all over with different analysts. But with the same validation problems. 

Realistically no one understands jobs, the regular tasks, the skills required, or the steps to resolve problems better than the people performing the jobs. Experienced HR practitioners may ask better questions but incumbents are still the primary source of job information. GAO is correct—the information is essential to effective human capital management.

Now, with job openings and market pay information readily available, the pressure for transparency, the increasingly rapid pace of change and the renewed interest in gender neutral talent practices, employers need to monitor changing job requirements. 

Today, software is available for every area of human capital management. Virtually all job information can be collected quickly and inexpensively by asking employees. A core question is how to access the software. The most practical answer for most organizations and most HR applications is licensing a software-as-a-service application since it’s used sporadically. Job classification, as a prime example, is used only when jobs or work systems are reconfigured.

Rebuilding the workforce will require current job and employee information. Decades old job information is not adequate.

NEXT STORY: The Model for Fixing the DOJ

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.