Rep. Joe Barton, with Rep. Pat Meehan (left) arrives on Capitol Hill Wednesday for a security briefing after a gunman opened fire at a congressional baseball practice in Alexandria, Virginia, wounding House Majority Whip Steve Scalise and others.

Rep. Joe Barton, with Rep. Pat Meehan (left) arrives on Capitol Hill Wednesday for a security briefing after a gunman opened fire at a congressional baseball practice in Alexandria, Virginia, wounding House Majority Whip Steve Scalise and others. J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Featured eBooks
Best Dates to Retire 2020
What’s Next for Federal Customer Experience
 The Future of the Air Force
After Shootings Come Unity, Resolve, and Talk of Tougher Security

Members vow to press ahead with business and baseball, but they also feel increasingly threatened.

The House is still reel­ing after the Wed­nes­day shoot­ing of a mem­ber of Con­gress, a staffer, a lob­by­ist, and two Cap­it­ol Po­lice of­ficers at an early-morn­ing base­ball prac­tice, but the pre­vail­ing sen­ti­ment is that the game must go on.

That rings true equally for the busi­ness of gov­ern­ing and the Con­gres­sion­al Base­ball Game, for which the Re­pub­lic­ans were prac­ti­cing when a gun­man opened fire and which will go on as sched­uled Thursday even­ing. After scrap­ping Wed­nes­day’s floor sched­ule, the House is ex­pec­ted to hold votes on Thursday and ad­journ for the bal­ance of the week.

“You’ll see in­creased se­cur­ity at the game, but it’s im­port­ant to let people know we’re go­ing to keep go­ing and you can’t let someone get you off what we’re sup­posed to be do­ing,” said Rep. Gregg Harp­er. “The game needs to go on. I think Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats alike agree we need to play the game. I think it’ll be very emo­tion­al.”

Des­pite the de­fi­ance and shows of unity, mem­bers are already talk­ing about ad­just­ing their be­ha­vi­or and se­cur­ity after Ma­jor­ity Whip Steve Scal­ise was shot. Harp­er, who as chair­man of the House Ad­min­is­tra­tion Com­mit­tee has over­sight of the Cap­it­ol Po­lice, said that he and his Sen­ate coun­ter­parts will ex­am­ine se­cur­ity pro­to­cols but that it is too early to tell wheth­er any changes will be made.

“We’re al­ways con­cerned about mem­bers’ se­cur­ity, so that’ll be an on­go­ing as­sess­ment as we go on. It’s still too early to come up with per­haps a policy change or something of that nature,” he said.

Many mem­bers, some who play on the base­ball team, poin­ted out that the only reas­on po­lice of­ficers were present and able to counter the at­tack­er was be­cause Scal­ise was in at­tend­ance and the two of­ficers were mem­bers of his se­cur­ity de­tail. If not for his pres­ence, mem­bers would have been un­guarded, as they of­ten are when they are off the heav­ily for­ti­fied Cap­it­ol com­plex.

“In a sense Steve Scal­ise took a bul­let for many of his col­leagues,” Rep. Trent Franks said. “If he hadn’t have been there, he wouldn’t have been hit. But if he hadn’t have been there, many oth­ers would have been.”

As a res­ult, some mem­bers are be­gin­ning to ques­tion wheth­er tight­er se­cur­ity should be put in place for lar­ger groups of mem­bers, even if there are no mem­bers of lead­er­ship present.

“At what point do you have a con­greg­a­tion of mem­bers—we’re not any more spe­cial than any­body else but we are tar­gets—do you have a se­cur­ity de­tail with you?” asked Rep. Barry Loudermilk, who wit­nessed the shoot­ing.

With the shoot­ing still fresh in mem­bers’ minds, the Cap­it­ol Hill com­munity is badly shaken. It was only a few years ago that then-Rep. Gab­ri­elle Gif­fords was shot at a con­stitu­ent event in Ari­zona. Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers noted that threats against them and their fam­il­ies seem to be on the rise since the in­aug­ur­a­tion of Pres­id­ent Trump. Some mem­bers called for tamp­ing down polit­ic­al rhet­or­ic.

Rep. Martha Mc­Sally, who now holds the dis­trict Gif­fords rep­res­en­ted, said an in­di­vidu­al who made threats against her will be ar­raigned later this week and noted that the polit­ic­al cli­mate seems to be stok­ing these threats.

“I don’t want to politi­cize this, but I do think we need to take a hard look in­side,” Mc­Sally said. “I think it’s an im­port­ant time to see this as a wake-up call. We saw this in my com­munity in 2011. We talked it about after the death threats against my­self, and I said then, a month ago, I feel like that in this en­vir­on­ment it’s only a mat­ter of time be­fore some act of vi­ol­ence is taken.”

Rep. Jeff Duncan said that he be­lieves the gun­man tar­geted the mem­bers be­cause they are Re­pub­lic­an. Duncan said he was leav­ing the base­ball prac­tice early when a man asked wheth­er it was Demo­crats or Re­pub­lic­ans who were prac­ti­cing. He said he only real­ized later that the man was the gun­man who opened fire after the in­ter­ac­tion.

“He asked me if it was a Re­pub­lic­an or Demo­crat­ic team prac­ti­cing and I told him it was a Re­pub­lic­an team. And he pro­ceeded to shoot Re­pub­lic­ans,” Duncan said. “I’m go­ing to take it as he was tar­get­ing Re­pub­lic­ans.”

Rep. Ron De­S­antis, who was with Duncan dur­ing that in­ter­ac­tion with the gun­man, said that he, on the oth­er hand, wants to with­hold judg­ment un­til the facts sur­face.

“I think there’s evid­ence that this par­tic­u­lar in­di­vidu­al may have ac­ted be­cause of a polit­ic­al motive. I still think you have to prove that some­how the cul­ture promp­ted him to do that. I don’t know. Maybe he just did it on his own. I don’t want to get car­ried away with that,” De­S­antis said.