IRS chief John Koskinen

IRS chief John Koskinen Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP file photo

Featured eBooks
Best Dates to Retire 2020
What’s Next for Federal Customer Experience
 The Future of the Air Force
Freedom Caucus Ups Pressure to Impeach IRS Commissioner

Jim Jordan and his allies are considering a move to force a September vote on impeaching John Koskinen.

Last Ju­ly, just as the House was pre­par­ing to break for sum­mer re­cess, Rep. Mark Mead­ows shocked his col­leagues by of­fer­ing a mo­tion to oust then-Speak­er John Boehner.

This year, Mead­ows and his House Free­dom Caucus col­leagues may be cel­eb­rat­ing that an­niversary by of­fer­ing a mo­tion to claim the head of an­oth­er sit­ting gov­ern­ment of­fi­cial. The group is act­ively dis­cuss­ing bring­ing up a priv­ileged mo­tion just be­fore the mid-Ju­ly break for­cing a vote on the im­peach­ment of IRS Com­mis­sion­er John Koskin­en.

The Free­dom Caucus has been push­ing GOP lead­ers for an im­peach­ment vote for months. In a private meet­ing earli­er this year, Mead­ows and Free­dom Caucus Chair­man Jim Jordan told Speak­er Paul Ry­an that they would con­sider the priv­ileged mo­tion if the Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee did not hold hear­ings on the is­sue.

House lead­ers may have thought that agree­ing to hear­ings took the mo­tion tac­tic off the table, but the Free­dom Caucus does not see it that way. Now that the hear­ings came and went, Jordan and his crew are again eye­ing the priv­ileged mo­tion in or­der to force the is­sue to the House floor.

“We have nev­er giv­en up on push­ing as hard as we can and in any way we can to push im­peach­ment,” Jordan said in an in­ter­view Tues­day. “We are look­ing to per­suade our lead­er­ship to move for­ward with im­peach­ment be­cause that’s what’s war­ran­ted.”

Ry­an—like Boehner be­fore him—has been reti­cent to move ahead on im­peach­ment. Lead­ers be­lieve that there is not a fool­proof case against Koskin­en, that an im­peach­ment vote would be un­ne­ces­sar­ily par­tis­an and ac­ri­mo­ni­ous, and that the Sen­ate would not move for­ward even if the House voted to im­peach. On top of that, lead­ers think it would set a dan­ger­ous pre­ced­ent; no ap­poin­ted ex­ec­ut­ive branch of­fi­cial has been im­peached since 1876.

Koskin­en is ac­cused of al­low­ing or or­der­ing the de­struc­tion of backup tapes that some Re­pub­lic­ans say con­tained emails prov­ing that his pre­de­cessor, Lois Lern­er, tar­geted con­ser­vat­ive groups for in­creased scru­tiny when they ap­plied for tax-ex­empt status. They also say he gave false testi­mony, though Demo­crats con­tend that all of those al­leg­a­tions are over­blown.

The Free­dom Caucus has made the im­peach­ment a cru­sade. If lead­ers de­cline to move for­ward, or if they only move ahead with a re­l­at­ively tooth­less cen­sure of Koskin­en, a mem­ber of the group could de­cide to bring up the mo­tion.

“Let’s say hy­po­thet­ic­ally lead­er­ship doesn’t want to go that far. At some point, wheth­er lead­er­ship agrees or not, a priv­ileged mo­tion comes to the floor,” said one Free­dom Caucus mem­ber, speak­ing an­onym­ously to dis­cuss their strategy. “If it’s done right be­fore the break, it be­comes a cam­paign is­sue over the sum­mer and we come back and either we vote to im­peach or we vote to keep him.”

Any mem­ber can bring up a priv­ileged mo­tion with no no­tice. Once it is brought up, lead­ers have 72 le­gis­lat­ive hours to hold a vote on the un­der­ly­ing is­sue. If the mo­tion is brought up just be­fore re­cess, lead­ers would have un­til the House re­turns to act un­less they choose to bring the mo­tion up right away.

A Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee aide said that since the two hear­ings they held, the pan­el is re­flect­ing on their op­tions and wheth­er Con­gress should take fur­ther ac­tion. One of those ac­tions could be a vote to cen­sure Koskin­en, but there is no guar­an­tee that would sat­is­fy all of the mem­bers of the Free­dom Caucus.

Mead­ows, for his part, said that he is hold­ing out hope that Ry­an and Ju­di­ciary Chair­man Bob Good­latte will re­port an im­peach­ment res­ol­u­tion out of com­mit­tee and onto the House floor.

“There’s really been no dis­cus­sions between lead­er­ship and mem­bers of the Free­dom Caucus that would sug­gest we’re go­ing any dir­ec­tion oth­er than pro­ceed­ing ahead with Chair­man Good­latte,” Mead­ows said.

Win­ning an im­peach­ment vote may be a tall or­der. Demo­crats say an in­spect­or gen­er­al looked in­to the al­leg­a­tions and found mid-level em­ploy­ees des­troyed the tapes, not Koskin­en. And there is no guar­an­tee that the Free­dom Caucus could con­vince their fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans that the al­leged mis­con­duct rises to the level of an im­peach­able of­fense.

Of course, those same Re­pub­lic­ans would be hard-pressed to de­fend the IRS when the agency re­mains deeply un­pop­u­lar with their base. Polit­ic­ally en­dangered Demo­crats could find them­selves in an awk­ward polit­ic­al po­s­i­tion with the vote as well. If the mo­tion is brought just be­fore re­cess, the vote wouldn’t oc­cur un­til Septem­ber, just two months be­fore Elec­tion Day.