Lawmakers confident on deficit deal but differ on the details

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said Democrats “finally accept” that “Republicans are willing to put revenues on the table.” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said Democrats “finally accept” that “Republicans are willing to put revenues on the table.” Susan Walsh/AP file photo

Lawmakers from both parties said on Sunday that Republicans’ willingness to accept new tax revenue from the elimination of some tax deductions could form the basis for an agreement to avert the so-called "fiscal cliff" of budget cuts and tax increases scheduled for January.

But lawmakers differed on the necessary components and even the timing of such an agreement.

“There is a basis for deal,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said on Fox News Sunday. Corker said Democrats “finally accept” that “Republicans are willing to put revenues on the table.”

But Corker said Republicans in exchange will demand cuts to entitlement spending.

President Obama has said he will veto any legislation extending tax cuts for people who earn more than $250,000 in household income a year. Republicans are hoping he will blink on that position and accept a deal that cuts tax deductions while reducing rates, a solution some Democrats say is insufficient to cut the deficit without hammering the middle class.

Obama appears to have leverage after his reelectoin, causing many on both sides of the aisle to argue Democrats have the upper hand to force their preferred solution. “I think we’re going to an Obama-type budget deal,” said the Weekly Standard’s William Kristol. “Elections have consequences.”

On Sunday, top Democrats stopped short of a flat refusal to consider a deal based on new revenue from sources other than increasing tax rates, but argued against that position.

“The starting point should be going back to rates as they existed under President Bill Clinton,” said House Budget Chairman Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., said he believed a deal can be reached during the lame duck session. But Conrad suggested a partial solution under which lawmakers agree to a down payment on the deficit; task committees of jurisdiction with finding new cuts; and impose a “backstop” of deeper reductions later if the panels don’t produce an agreement. That is an approach worked on by the “Gang of Eight” senators, including Conrad, who are drafting a plan based on the conclusions of the Simpson-Bowles Commission commissioned in 2010 by the president to address fiscal issues.

“You can’t deal with every detail in a few weeks,” Conrad said.

Conrad , who is retiring after the lame-duck session, said better-designed cuts than those scheduled for implementation would create a more effective backstop.

Corker argued that “it would be a travesty for our country if the reason we don’t go over the cliff is we kick the can down the road.”

Corker on Friday faulted the Gang of Eight. The senator said he had shelved his own deficit plan so that talks between President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, take precedence.

“Now is not the time for any of us, Republicans, Democrats, groups or gangs, to be publicly promoting our own plans,” Corker said in a statement.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.