EEOC reports record rise in bias complaints, progress in trimming backlog

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Tuesday reported that private sector job discrimination complaints rose to an unprecedented level of nearly 100,000 in fiscal 2010, an increase of 6,715 over the previous year, while the agency documented clear progress in reducing a backlog of unprocessed charges.

Through its programs in enforcement, mediation and litigation over complaints of bias -- based on race, gender, disability, religion and retaliation -- EEOC in 2010 secured more than $404 million in benefits for victims from employers. That is the highest level of monetary relief ever obtained by the commission through the administrative process, the report said.

"We are pleased to see that our rebuilding efforts are having an impact on how efficiently and effectively the commission enforces the civil rights laws protecting the nation's workers," said EEOC Chairwoman Jacqueline A. Berrien. "Discrimination continues to be a substantial problem for too many job seekers and workers, and we must continue to build our capacity to enforce the laws that ensure that workplaces are free of unlawful bias."

Comparing its progress over the previous year's output, EEOC said it ended 2010 with an increase of only 1 percent in its overall inventory of pending charges, compared with an increase of 15.9 percent from fiscal 2008 to 2009. EEOC's mediation program achieved 10 percent more resolutions in 2010 than it did the previous year and resolved 400 more federal sector appeals than it did in 2009.

Analysts linked the rise in complaints to the recession. Retired Harvard University historian Stephan Thernstrom, who has written widely on race and poverty, said given that "a lot more people were laid off in 2009 and 2010, it's not surprising that some fraction somehow thought it was racially related."

Roger Clegg, president and general counsel of the conservative Center for Equal Opportunity, said, "The number of complaints is not something the EEOC has direct control over. If you have a workforce that gets larger, as it is, and anti-discrimination statutes rising, as they are, and statutes are amended to allow for additional challenges, then the fact that there are more complaints doesn't say anything about the job EEOC is doing, or about the amount of discrimination in society."

Clegg's group has long complained that the EEOC and the Obama administration devote too many resources to cases based on the statistically "disparate impact" of hiring, firing and promotion policies instead of actual "disparate treatment" of individuals. "Under both the Obama and the Bush administrations," he said, "there's been a lot of disparate treatment aimed at nonminorities and men as corporations celebrate diversity, but the EEOC is not looking into it."

Fatima Goss Graves, vice president for education and employment at the National Women's Law Center, noted that the EEOC's commissioners have been at full complement only since last spring, "so the fact that they had this tremendous level of charges in this fiscal year but did not increase the backlog says a lot." At the same time, she added, "There is still a tremendous amount of work to be done."

Even though many agencies are girding for possible hiring freezes and cutbacks, the EEOC said on its website that it is hiring investigators, mediators, attorneys, and administrative and clerical employees around the country, "adding positions frequently."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.