Jacquelyn Martin/AP

Ready, Set, Retire
What's Next for Government Data
Smart Cities: Beyond the Buzz
Why Obama Is Saying 'Torture' Matters

On Friday, the president went further than Senate Intelligence in harshly characterizing CIA abuses, making a powerful statement in the process.

Friday wasn't the first time President Obama used the word "torture" to describe the "enhanced interrogation techniques" used by the Central Intelligence Agency against terrorism suspects, but this time might be the most meaningful.

Obama's remarks came at the end of an impromptu session with reporters in the White House briefing room. Asked about a classified Senate report that delved into CIA actions during the Bush administration, the president responded by saying the report concluded that in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, "we did some things that were wrong. We did a whole lot of things that were right, but we tortured some folks. We did some things that were contrary to our values."

Obama made similar remarks last year in a speech at the National Defense University—and, as far back as 2009, he referred to "waterboarding" as torture. But it carries greater weight now, with the expectation that portions of the Senate report will be declassified in the coming days at the urging of the White House.

That report, which chronicles a series of CIA abuses, does not use the word "torture" to characterize excessive interrogation practices, according to The Daily Beast. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which conducted the probe has said its findings will reveal abuse that is "chilling" and "systematic and widespread." The report is also expected to conclude that the enhanced techniques were not effective in yielding useful intelligence.

"Torture" and the connotations it carries has been a loaded word politically since George W. Bush's first term. And Obama's decision to use it immediately sparked outrage from conservatives on Twitter. (Obama was also criticized for using the colloquial "folks" to describe those interrogated.)

But it appears to have been a choice by the president to cast the CIA's practices in the most brutal terms in order to make his condemnation of them as powerful as possible, sending a signal both at home and abroad that such practices are no longer sanctioned. That way, when the report does become public, Obama's words Friday will still be echoing. At the same time, it likely will do little to mollify critics who say his administration has failed to hold CIA agents who conducted the interrogations legally accountable.

Obama also used the occasion to support CIA Director John Brennan, who apologized this week to lawmakers after an internal probe found that CIA agents had broken into computers used by the Senate Intelligence Committee. At least one member of that committee, Mark Udall of Colorado, has called for Brennan to resign. But the president seemed to put that matter to rest, for now. "I have full confidence in John Brennan," Obama said.

NEXT STORY: How Not to Cry at Work