Friction between union, managers at Social Security goes public

Office of Personnel Management Director John Berry responded Tuesday to a complaint about a lack of managers at labor-management meetings at the Social Security Administration.

Since President Obama extended an executive order encouraging labor-management forums at agencies, SSA employee Patricia Spade said, the group at her department consists only of “high-level executives and unions” who consider participation by managers a “deal breaker.”

Addressing Berry at the national conference of the Federal Managers Association -- which also has been calling for greater participation by management associations in the meetings -- Spade said many proposals that arise in the forum “need tweaking” by management and the American Federation of Government Employees is “calling the shots and dissing” the other unions, leaving her “embarrassed.”

SSA for more than two years has struggled for consensus on labor-management issues.

Besides AFGE, the largest union in the agency, SSA employees also are represented by the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, the National Treasury Employees Union, and the National Federation of Federal Employees.

Berry said, “one group shouldn’t dominate, and there should be a spirit of partnership that says, Let’s work together pre-decisionally, sitting down so that the manager corps can adapt.” He acknowledged “some jealousies and friction points on which managers should be at the table” but said managers are not ceding supervisory authority and the trouble spots are “not spread widely.”

“At OPM, managers are at the table with AFGE locals, which may be a model for other agencies,” Berry said. At SSA, “neither side is blameless. There is a tendency to let the past constrain the future,” he said. “But we don’t want to be like Northern Ireland and talk forever with the same dug-in on old positions and old thinking.”

Involvement of managers is essential, Berry said, adding there are not enough senior executives for the 2,000 labor-management forum sites around the country.

He told reporters afterward that he has worked on the problem with SSA Commissioner Michael Astrue as well as George Cohen, director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. Berry called for “more trust, dialogue and respectful conversations.” But he told the audience member he would take Spade’s complaint under consideration.

Asked by Government Executive for a reaction, AFGE National President John Gage, said in an email, “It is unfortunate that erroneous rumors and uninformed opinions are being spread about the labor-management process between AFGE and SSA. It is ridiculous to say that AFGE is keeping managers from being on the [labor-management forums]. Management chooses its members, and the union chooses its members. AFGE does not have the ability to dictate to SSA who gets to be at the table.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.