Personnel officials weigh creating separate training budgets

Federal human resources experts said Tuesday that agencies may be able to protect funds for employee training from budget cuts if the spending is designated with a separate line item in their budgets. But this strategy can backfire if it draws attention to the funds.

Most agencies would like to devote more resources to staff training and development, said Robert Tobias, director of the Institute for the Study of Public Policy Implementation at American University in Washington. The institute sponsored a forum on training budgets Tuesday. But when money is tight, Tobias said, agencies and congressional appropriations committees often think of training as a "discretionary expenditure that can be cut," he said.

Tobias said making training a specific line item could call attention to its importance and help keep funding steady in good times and bad. But other participants warned that this strategy sometimes has the opposite effect.

When Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, drafted civil service reform legislation (S. 2651) earlier this year, he considered including a provision requiring all agencies to treat training as a budget line item, said Mike Dovilla, one of his staffers, at the forum. Voinovich decided against the provision because he was concerned it might backfire by making agencies' training budgets more visible, and therefore more vulnerable to cuts during the appropriations process, Dovilla said.

Agencies tend to lump employee development funds with travel and other miscellaneous expenditures in their budgets, making it hard to identify the amount of money devoted to training alone, Dovilla said. If they made training a line item, it would appear separately in the budget.

Agencies could benefit from knowing exactly how much money is available to spend on training, Dovilla said. Two years ago, 11 of 12 agencies surveyed by his office could not pinpoint the amount they spent on employee development. The 12th was reluctant to share how much money was spent, for fear of incurring budget cuts.

The Justice Department already includes training as a line item within its budget, and has noticed some positive effects, said Debra Tomchek, Justice's personnel chief. Justice still needs to provide better training for its support and administrative staff, Tomchek said, but the agency has made a big effort to give its core legal and law enforcement staff adequate resources for employee development. For instance, Justice runs the National Advocacy Center in Columbia, S.C., to train its legal staff. Funds for the center are set aside as a line item in the agency's budget.

The appropriations process is inherently "high risk" with a lot of chances for "things to get derailed," Tomchek said, but it is still important for agencies to find a way to set aside a steady stream of money for training. She suggested that agencies afraid of making employee development a line item for appropriations purposes begin by experimenting with pilot programs that have specific line items.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.