Poll: Feds are fed up with charity campaign


Most federal employees said they don’t plan to donate money to charities this year through the Combined Federal Campaign, according to an informal Government Executive poll.

Sixty percent of 1,529 respondents indicated feds would not contribute to the government’s annual program to raise money for charities while 28 percent said they would give money and 12 percent were undecided. The poll, posted online on Aug. 30, asked respondents four questions about their past and future contributions to CFC and tallied individual votes for each query. The results are as of Sept. 10.

The poll also showed that a government pay freeze and proposals to increase the amount they contribute to their pensions are taking a toll on federal employees’ good will -- at least as it relates to giving to charities through CFC. Fifty-seven percent of 1,324 respondents surveyed said concerns over changes to pay and benefits would affect their decision to contribute to the campaign in 2012. Of that total, 34 percent said threats to pay and benefits would not affect their decision to donate, while 9 percent were undecided.

Some feds said in Government Executive’s online comments section that they planned to give to charities outside of the CFC program. “I have always, always contributed generously to CFC,” said a commenter. “This year, I will still donate the same amount to United Way and other favorite charities, but will do so individually, not through CFC.” Another reader expressed frustration over “being targeted as the villains in the budget drama,” and arguments that federal workers are overpaid compared to their private sector counterparts. “My days of giving to the CFC are done,” the reader said. “Charity begins at home and, where I can afford it, I will give outside of the CFC.” The 2012 Combined Federal Campaign started Sept. 1 and runs through Dec. 15. Federal employees traditionally have been very generous with their donations; $7 billion has been raised for good causes since CFC’s creation in 1961.

“We do not set annual goals in the CFC and welcome all voluntary contributions, large or small,” said a spokesperson for the Office of Personnel Management, which runs the program.

OPM last summer asked former Reps. Beverly Byron, D-Md., and Tom Davis, R-Va., to lead a commission recommending improvements to CFC. The panel suggested expanding the campaign’s donor pool, increase its fundraising transparency, extend the deadline for giving, use more technology to reduce costs and streamline the overall program, and create a voluntary relief fund that donors can contribute to immediately after a disaster. OPM is considering these and other recommendations.

OPM Director John Berry sent a memorandum to agencies in August encouraging them to allow employees to serve as coordinators and leaders during the 2012 Combined Federal Campaign. He praised the 51-year-old program for the billions it has raised and listed reasons feds should consider giving through CFC, including low overhead costs, a steady stream of revenue for charities throughout the year and the convenience of online pledging.

OPM’s inspector general in March released an audit of the Washington-area CFC, which found more than $300,000 in questionable expenses. Some of the money went toward overcharges for food, travel and other campaign expenses, the audit said. As a result of that report, OPM prohibited spending donations on meals, travel or entertainment. In light of the IG’s audit, the commission also recommended that OPM improve its oversight of the CFC program and reduce certain costs associated with it.

Most poll respondents also said they’d contributed to CFC during the past two years, despite a civilian pay freeze that took effect in January 2011. Sixty-five percent said they gave money during that period compared to 35 percent who did not donate through CFC. For those who have contributed before to the government’s annual giving campaign, most said they will contribute less money in 2012: 66 percent of the 1,138 votes in response to that question were for “less,” while 31 percent said they would contribute the same amount as in previous years and 3 percent said they would donate more money than before. In 2011, federal employees pledged more than $272 million to charities, according to OPM. That’s roughly $10 million less than the amounts raised in 2010 and 2009.

The poll results and comments from readers indicate a desire to continuing giving to charitable causes, but less enthusiasm to do so through CFC. “Take a moment, and a breath,” said one commenter. “Acknowledge your disappointment, but please still consider giving; regardless of the manner, method or vehicle. Some have it far worse.”

Note: The poll counted the number of votes for each question. For the purposes of this story, we considered votes synonymous with respondents. So, for example: 1,529 votes are 1,529 respondents.

This story was updated on Sept. 11 to add comment.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.