Analysis: Senator Julian Assange, Care of Edward Snowden

Flickr user bbwbryant

Julian Assange may not be able to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. But that's not stopping him from announcing a campaign for the Senate in Australia.

On Thursday, Assange announced seven candidates from his WikiLeaks Party for the Senate elections this year. One of those candidates is Assange himself. Assange has been stuck in the embassy for over a year now, avoiding extradition to Sweden where he is wanted over charges of sexual assault. But the isolation hasn't been all bad for Assange. In the last month, he's even managed to regain some of the spotlight that could be a boost for his senate campaign. That boost is, of course, NSA leaker Edward Snowden.

Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have taken some command over the Snowden situation in the last month, helping him evade U.S. authorities in getting out of Hong Kong, paying for Snowden's travel and legal assistance, and helping his search for asylum. WikiLeaks has also acted as something of a public-relations in-between for Snowden, issuing press releases on his behalf. In a June interview on ABC's This Week, Assange sought to benefit from the then-mixed opinions that many in the world felt about Snowden, saying that the two of them were in a "very similar" situation.

For Snowden, the relationship with WikiLeaks hasn't been all beneficial. Assange's aggressive involvement in the case apparently helped to turn Ecuador's President Rafael Correa against giving Snowden asylum. And the continued connection between Snowden and WikiLeaks may not do much to improve goodwill towards Snowden: a CNN poll in late 2010 found that 77 percent of Americans disapproved of the organization's leaks, and a Washington Post poll from the same time found that 59 percent of Americans thought Assange should be arrested by the U.S. government.

For WikiLeaks and Assange though, Edward Snowden has been a revelation. By early July, WikiLeaks had raised about $1,300 a day since joining up with Snowden. And as Caitlin Dickson and Eliza Shapiro write for The Daily Beast, WikiLeaks can seriously use the money. A founding member of the organization that manages WikiLeaks' finances said that "the level of donation rises whenever the organization is in the press." And the boost in press is evident just from a quick search on Google Trends alone: In the last year, "WikiLeaks" was only searched more (by a hefty margin) when Assange was granted asylum from Ecuador. That extra money could obviously help fuel a political campaign (Australia does not ban foreign political donations right now, although there has been some movement toward reform).

A June poll from before WikiLeaks tied itself to Snowden showed that the WikiLeaks Party may actually have a shot in Australia. A survey from Morgan Poll found that 21 percent of Australian voters would consider voting for Assange's party, which is more support than any other new parties received. If he should actually win, Assange says his plan is "to essentially parachute in a crack troop of investigative journalists into the Senate and to do what we have done with WikiLeaks, in holding banks and government and intelligence agencies to account."

But what would happen if Assange actually wins a Senate seat, but isn't able to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy? Assange said this question is "extremely interesting." He said he would plan on putting forward a replacement candidate from the WikiLeaks Party to hold the seat until he is able to take his place.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.