TSP funds march slowly upward in July

Roman Sigaev/Shutterstock.com

All but one of the five basic funds in the Thrift Savings Plan grew in July, albeit very slightly.

The C Fund, invested in common stocks on Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, boasted the highest returns for the month, at just 1.4 percent. It has grown 11.12 percent in 2012.

Fixed income bonds in the F Fund were close behind, earning 1.38 percent in July and 3.83 percent this year. International stocks in the I Fund rose 0.56 percent for the month and matched the F Fund’s 2012 gains, at 3.83 percent.

Government securities inched up 0.12 percent last month, bringing the G Fund’s gains for this year to 0.91 percent.

The S Fund, which is invested in small and midsize companies and tracks the Dow Jones Wilshire 4500 Index, was the sole TSP offering to end July in the red, with losses of 0.62 percent. Nonetheless, it has posted solid returns for the year, at 8.53 percent.

TSP’s life-cycle funds, designed to move investors to less risky portfolios as they near retirement, all had tiny but positive growth in July. L Income, for employees who have reached their target retirement date and started withdrawing money, increased 0.37 percent; L 2020 grew 0.63 percent; L 2030 gained 0.71 percent; L 2040 was up 0.75 percent; and L 2050 rose 0.78 percent.

Similarly, L Fund gains for 2012 have been small, but positive. L Income is up 2.75 percent; L 2020, 5.49 percent; L 2030, 6.51 percent; L 2040, 7.27 percent; and L 2050, 7.88 percent.

(Image via Roman Sigaev /Shutterstock.com)

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.