GAO recommends OPM improve group life insurance disclosures

The Office of Personnel Management must improve the information it provides on the group life insurance program offered to federal employees and develop a more structured process for reviewing the program, according to a Government Accountability Office report released Monday.

GAO reviewed key policy documents of OPM's Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance program, which provides more than 4 million federal employees and annuitants with insurance in the event of their death. The watchdog evaluated FEGLI's structure and operations, OPM's oversight of the program, and the use of retained asset accounts in the FEGLI claims payments. Auditors concluded that OPM provides insufficient material on FEGLI to federal employees, including information on retained asset account operations and protections.

"Because life insurance is an important purchase for those seeking to protect their dependents, prospective buyers need to fully understand the details of the policy they are considering," GAO wrote. "Although OPM provides significant information on its life insurance program, some information that could influence federal employees' decision to buy FEGLI coverage is lacking."

GAO concluded that some key parts of the FEGLI plan were not properly disclosed or explained to federal employees. For example, OPM does not make clear that because FEGLI offers federal employees post-retirement coverage not commonly found in private sector group plans, its premiums might be higher. In addition, OPM does not disclose FEGLI's level-premium and composite rate structure for basic coverage, GAO wrote. FEGLI's level-premiums make insurance rates higher earlier in life and gradually decrease in later years, differing from many private sector plans; employees pay the same average rate under the composite average rate structure, regardless of age or health.

"Because these features can make FEGLI premiums look more expensive than private individual coverage without them, especially to younger and healthier individuals, some employees might conclude that FEGLI coverage is not a beneficial choice and pass up a potentially valuable benefit," the report stated. "Conversely, someone planning to work for the federal government for a short period of time might purchase FEGLI coverage without realizing that the coverage includes a retirement benefit they may not receive and will likely cost more than a group policy without such a benefit."

GAO also found that OPM has omitted important information from its disclosures about the retained asset account settlement option in the FEGLI plan. Beneficiaries can choose either a lump-sum check payment or a retained asset account. Although OPM recently revised some of its disclosures and added more information on the asset accounts, "the disclosures still do not contain some important information," GAO noted.

"While [retained asset accounts] may offer benefits that some beneficiaries appreciate, such as certain flexibilities and a guaranteed interest rate, they also have certain characteristics that need to be fully disclosed," the report stated.

Those characteristics include the new contract between beneficiaries and MetLife that is regulated by states rather than by the federal government and is subject to state-based protections. Beneficiaries might not be aware of the new contract, according to the GAO report.

"The disclosures do not provide the information that beneficiaries need to find the proper regulator should they have questions about their accounts -- a problem that is complicated by the fact that regulators themselves may disagree over which one has jurisdiction," GAO said.

GAO recommended that OPM include more "complete and accurate" information on key FEGLI benefits such as RAAs and post-retirement coverage "to ensure federal employees have all the information they need." Additionally, OPM should "develop and implement a more structured process for comparing FEGLI with private sector group life insurance plans," the report stated.

OPM Director John Berry concurred with all GAO's recommendations. In an Oct. 28 letter, Berry wrote: "We strive for transparency of our program and will provide more information about the level-premium structure, including the composite rates and post retirement coverage, to ensure federal employees have what they need to make an informed decision."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.