Stimulus oversight board takes waste and fraud prevention steps

The board overseeing the $787 billion economic stimulus effort recently released a checklist designed to help agencies prevent waste, fraud and abuse when making Recovery Act contract awards.

According to Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board spokesman Ed Pound, panel chairman Earl Devaney created an outreach program to engage with agencies receiving stimulus funds on potential procurement issues. Representatives of the board met with senior procurement compliance officials to ensure open communication and discuss trends in procurement waste and fraud, Pound said.

As part of this outreach, the board developed a pre-award and award procurement guide for agencies. The contract checklist, Pound said, will ensure agencies follow best practices as well as the priorities -- such as a preference for fixed price contracting -- laid out by the president.

The checklist includes stimulus-specific points such as ensuring that interagency acquisitions include agreements for who is responsible for reporting data, as well as more general questions such as: "Were all authorized small business contracting programs considered?"

Many of the questions focus on ensuring that stimulus solicitations are posted in a way that attracts the greatest number of qualified bidders and that identifies the award as being under the Recovery Act. The list also addresses President Obama's desire that stimulus contracting actions be transparent to the public by asking if the description of the supplies or services to be procured was "clear and unambiguous to the general public."

In addition to creating the checklist, the board is conducting its own risk analyses and working closely with the inspector general community to prevent fraud, according to Pound. These steps are part of efforts to head off fraud or abuse before it occurs. Lawmakers and the media have repeatedly cited estimates that government entities lose an average of 7 percent of revenue to fraud and abuse annually. Applied to the stimulus, that would amount to $55 billion in lost funds.

Devaney has called that number "unacceptable" and Pound said the board is optimistic it will keep fraud and waste down.

"We don't think there's going to be anywhere near the 7 percent fraud problem in [the stimulus], and if there is, there's been a failure," Pound said. "It's all tagged as Recovery dollars, so if you steal this money, you've got to have a lot of guts."

Despite the anti-waste and fraud measures built into the Recovery Act and mandated by the Obama administration, Pound said the board understands there still is a level of risk.

"Any time you spend billions of dollars there are going to be concerns about fraud, waste and mismanagement, given the nature of humans," he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.