Then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton hands off her mobile phone after arriving for a meeting in The Hague, Netherlands, Dec. 8, 2011.

Then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton hands off her mobile phone after arriving for a meeting in The Hague, Netherlands, Dec. 8, 2011. AP file photo

Which Clinton Aide Arranged the Private Email Server?

Eight former aides declined to cooperate with the State IG; two others failed to respond to the IG’s requests.

When the State Department watchdog on May 25 released a damning report on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s lapses in email management, the footnotes added a new wrinkle to the story that could force other shoes to drop in the 2016 presidential campaign.

“In addition to Secretary Clinton, eight former Department employees declined OIG requests for interviews,” Inspector General Steve Linick wrote after itemizing by title the dozens of current and former State employees who did cooperate with investigators in the highly scrutinized controversy. Two additional individuals did not respond to the IG’s requests.

Still unanswered is the question of which State Department specialists in information technology, records management and classification law OK’d the unusual arrangement. The IG found no evidence that Clinton had sought permission for the private server, though Clinton has repeatedly said that the arrangement “was permitted.”

As it happens, many of those who declined to talk to the IG have been or soon will be deposed by the FBI, which is probing possible mishandling of classified information at State, as well as lawyers for Judicial Watch, the conservative legal transparency group that has won rulings from two judges allowing interviews with Clinton associates.

Government Executive has assembled profiles of 12 current or former aides and associates with Clinton who have or will be interviewed. (Neither the IG staff nor State press officers would identify the individuals beyond their titles, but public records and Judicial Watch documents provide a solid selection.)

Judicial Watch takes credit for launching the Freedom of Information Act litigation last year that forced the State Department to confirm Clinton’s use of a private server. And it considers the State watchdog report “scathing” but built on many facts Judicial Watch already knew.

“The narrative that Mrs. Clinton would like you to believe is that she was not savvy about email and therefore this just happened,” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton told Government Executive. “The counter-narrative is that she knew exactly what happened at State—she knew the law and her associates knew the law and sought to upend FOIA and the Federal Records Act.”

What, in Fitton’s view, would Clinton be trying to hide? “The emails already released are what they tried to hide”—the emails to her daughter, for example, Fitton said. “None were released voluntarily. We already know what they were hiding. The question is what [emails] have not been turned over yet and that State has not released.”

Here are the main players in the multiple investigations, and the status of their interviews:

Hillary Clinton, currently out on the campaign trail as primary season nears an end, declined to be interviewed by State Department IG staff. She has said repeatedly that she has not yet been interviewed by the FBI but is ready. Judicial Watch, meanwhile, maintains a plan to follow through on a judge’s assertion that Clinton might be interviewed in its FOIA litigation over whether the State Department did a thorough search for documents related to the 2012 deaths of four American officials in Benghazi, Libya. Justice Department lawyers last week challenged that request.

Mills

Cheryl Mills, an attorney and academic administrator who worked for the Clinton White House during the 1999 impeachment trial of then-President Bill Clinton, was counselor and chief of staff to Hillary Clinton during her four years as secretary of State. Mills, who also was counsel to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, was deposed on May 27 by a Judicial Watch attorney (see transcript). Very little thought was given to email issues during the 2009 transition to the State Department, she said, though the staff routinely complied with FOIA records requests handled by another office. Mills is also scheduled to testify in a case involving the “special government employee” status of Clinton deputy Huma Abedin.

Abedin

Huma Abedin, deputy chief of staff at State during the Clinton years, is a trusted personal aide who interned for then-First Lady Clinton in the 1990s. Her multiple roles on the Clinton campaigns, with the Clinton Foundation and State Department are under various reviews. Many of the Clinton emails released over the past year had her name in them. She has been interviewed by the FBI on email classification issues but declined to speak to the IG staff. She is scheduled to testify in the Judicial Watch proceedings on June 28.

Sullivan

Jake Sullivan was director of policy planning at State for much of Clinton’s tenure, having worked on her 2008 presidential campaign. He is reported to have authored many of the emails that the State Department has withheld for national security concerns. He previously was chief counsel and senior policy adviser to Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. He left State in 2014 to teach at the Yale University Law School. He declined to speak to the IG staff and his interview status with the FBI is unclear.

Kennedy

Patrick Kennedy, the undersecretary of State for management since 2007, is a career Foreign Service officer. He remains responsible for the people, resources, budget, facilities, technology, financial operations, consular affairs, logistics, contracting and security for State operations, and is the secretary’s principal advisor on management issues. He played a major role in the controversy over U.S. consulate security during the Benghazi attack. Kennedy did cooperate with the State IG and is scheduled to testify to Judicial Watch on June 29.

Pagliano

Bryan Pagliano is an information technology specialist who worked on Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign and was appointed to do IT at the State Department by Patrick Kennedy, according to a Reuters report. He is said to have set up the private server in Clinton’s New York home. He declined to testify before Congress on creation of the private email server and received an immunity grant from Justice. He declined to cooperate with State IG staff, but has been interviewed by the FBI. He is scheduled to testify to Judicial Watch June 6.

Stephen Mull, most recently the U.S. ambassador to Poland, was executive secretary of the State Department from 2010 to 2012. From 2008 to 2010, Mull served as senior advisor to then-Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns. He is scheduled to testify to Judicial Watch on June 6.

Lukens

Lewis Lukens was executive director of State’s Executive Secretariat from 2008 to 2011, providing all logistical and travel support for Clinton and traveling with her frequently. He testified on May 18 to Judicial Watch’s attorney, saying he had been asked to arrange a way for incoming Secretary Clinton to access the Internet in her office—where her Blackberry was banned for security reasons—to check personal email. "The reason that I proposed a PC was that it would make it easier for her to log on,” Lukens said. That personal computer was never installed. “And at that point, as far as I knew, there was no requirement for her to be connected to our system.” More recently Lukens was ambassador to Senegal and Guinea-Bissau, and is now a visiting diplomat at the University of California at Berkeley.

John Bentel was director of State’s Executive Secretariat’s Office of Information Resources Management before retiring in 2012. His possible role was singled out by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, on May 26 after the State IG report came out for having warned Secretary Clinton that transparency laws would apply to any email arrangement. The IG said Bentel told concerned State Department staff “never to speak of Secretary Clinton’s personal email system again.” Bentel declined to speak to the IG staff or Grassley’s Judiciary Committee, but through his attorney, he said he learned of Clinton’s private server only later from the press. Bentel told the House Select Committee on Benghazi the same thing, Yahoo News reported.

Thomas Nides, deputy secretary of State for Management and Resources from 2011 to 2013, did not respond to interview requests from the State Department IG. He is now vice chairman at Morgan Stanley.

Clarence Finney, a current State Department deputy director of the Executive Secretariat staff, is a records management official. He has been requested to testify by Judicial Watch.

Lauren Jiloty, a former special assistant to Clinton, worked on Clinton’s Senate staff and previously on that of Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla. According to LinkedIn, she now works as senior executive assistant at bgC3, LLC, a think tank founded by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. Judicial Watch has requested her testimony.

Monica Hanley was a Clinton aide at State from 2009 to 2013 who appears in the released Clinton emails as helping Clinton with the times of her favorite TV shows and striving to ease Clinton’s “confusion” about organizing phone calls. She previously worked for Clinton’s Senate office and became Clinton’s transition personnel office director, according to The Daily Caller.

This is only a partial list. Judicial Watch also plans to hear testimony on June 8 from unnamed specialty witnesses who will be selected by the State Department.

(Photos of Cheryl Mills via Susan Walsh/AP, Patrick Kennedy via the State Department, Jake Sullivan via Cliff Owen/AP, Huma Abedin via Seth Wenig/AP, Bryan Pagliano via Cliff Owen/AP, and Lewis Lukens via Harry Hamburg/AP)

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.