GSA Reassures D.C. It’s Still Eligible for New FBI Headquarters Site

The current Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters The current Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

Not so fast, said the General Services Administration in regard to reports of a recent letter from the District of Columbia’s Planning and Economic Development office effectively withdrawing from the competition to land the new FBI headquarters site.

The same week in which lawmakers and local officials from Maryland and Virginia offered dueling proposals to attract the FBI to the suburbs, GSA spokesman Dan Cruz told Government Executive, “We welcome the District of Columbia’s submission to this competitive process.”

District Deputy Mayor Victor Hoskins in his Nov. 26 letter to GSA Administrator Dan Tangherlini had interpreted the criteria in GSA’s Request for Expressions of Interest to mean the federal government’s landlord agency was favoring sites larger than the 40 acres at Poplar Point in Anacostia that D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray had offered last March. “The District has long served as the home of the FBI headquarters and would like the opportunity to continue to do so,” Hoskins wrote. “While the noted criteria do not explicitly prevent a submission, the District would have appreciated competing in a process that didn’t have the appearance of eliminating Poplar Point as a possible relocation site.”

To clear up the confusion, Cruz said, “The language regarding the acreage is not a minimum nor a maximum requirement. Smaller or larger sites that satisfy all minimum requirements of square footage, security, access to public transit and access to the Capital Beltway will be considered. Any jurisdiction or property owner within the delineated area that believes they have a site that would satisfy the needs of this project is strongly encouraged to propose that property for consideration.”

Specifically, GSA’s requirements call for land “approximately 50 acres” situated “within two miles of a Metrorail station, and either inside the Capital Beltway or within 2.5 miles of a Capital Beltway interchange.”

A D.C. Council resolution introduced earlier this year by councilmembers Jack Evans and Vincent B. Orange Sr. contained language backing an effort by Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., to keep the FBI within the capital city’s borders. It mentioned possibilities of the former Walter Reed Army Medical Center site in Ward 4, the former Coast Guard headquarters at Buzzards Point in Ward 6, or the St. Elizabeth’s campus in Ward 8.

The draft resolution criticized the Maryland and Virginia options by saying the roads in those states are inadequate, that state budgets too tight and FBI employees would suffer from longer commutes. It added, “The potential redevelopment of the current FBI headquarters would have a tremendous positive effect on the District economy if it is done in the right way.”

GSA hopes to pick the list of submitted sites available for use as part of the developer solicitation by this spring during study of impact under the National Environmental Policy Act. The agency would then issue a formal request for proposals by spring or summer.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.