Federal managers retain wrong employees, feds say


Federal employees worry their agencies are allowing their best employees to leave public service while retaining poor performers, according to a new report.

Less than a quarter of federal workers believe their organization “addresses poor performers effectively,” the Merit Systems Protection Board found in a workforce survey. Only 41 percent said their organization retains the best employees.

MSPB -- an independent, quasi-judicial agency that serves to protect federal employees -- conducted the survey to assess the federal workforce’s perceptions of the merit systems principles, or the “human resources policies and practices designed to ensure that people are recruited, managed and retained on the basis of their abilities and performance.”

While MSPB said managers need to improve their “stewardship” of employees -- how they use and develop talent -- feds said they feel protected and treated fairly under the merit system's principles. A majority of respondents said their agencies prevent discrimination, offer fair pay and recruit a diverse application pool.

There remained room for improvement in the fairness category, however, as less than 30 percent of respondents felt their agency did not engage in favoritism.

The government also has room to reduce waste, as more than 70 percent federal employees said their agency does not adequately eliminate unnecessary functions and positions.

To address the perceived shortcomings, MSPB recommended additional education for federal supervisors on MSPB’s guidelines. It also suggested involving employees in identifying ways to remain efficient and target redundancies. Managers should take an active role in retaining good employees, while recognizing and dismissing the bad ones, MSPB said.

“Eliminating unnecessary functions and positions and effectively addressing poor performing employees,” MSPB wrote in its report, “are particularly vital for agencies if they are going to show Congress, the President, and the American people, that they have done as much as possible with as few resources as possible.”

MSPB also recommended increasing efficiency by better preparing the workforce, as only 60 percent of employees felt they received the necessary training for their job.

MSPB surveyed a random sample of full-time employees across 24 departments and agencies in 2010, though the report was just recently released. 

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.