Air Force launches latest effort to replace aging tankers
Document signals agency is exploring a range of options, from purchases of new and used commercial aircraft, to leasing services.
The Air Force on Tuesday released a long-awaited document asking for reaction from industry on a wide range of options to replace the service's fleet of 1950s-era aerial refueling tankers.
The "request for information" is the first official outreach to industry in a yearlong process to select a contractor, or perhaps contractors, to update the tanker fleet. As expected, the document explores purchasing both new and used commercial aircraft, as well as leasing tanker services from contractors and upgrading engines and other parts in some of the Boeing KC-135s now in use.
A Senate aide called the document a "good first step" and lauded the Air Force for considering several approaches to upgrading its tanker fleet.
But the so-called RFI may not reveal what the Air Force ultimately wants in its long-sought fleet of modern tankers. The document is "comforting to those that want the Air Force to pursue a wide range of options and not to walk down a particular path prematurely," said Christopher Bolkcom, a Congressional Research Service analyst who monitors the Air Force.
"Those people who want them to keep a wide view should not be too encouraged, however, because ... just because the Air Force throws that net out there doesn't mean they have to keep everything they catch." Indeed, the Air Force clearly states in its solicitation that the "government does not intend to award a contract on the basis of this advertisement."
But the breadth of the request could indicate that the Air Force may opt for a mixed fleet of new and used aircraft augmented by leasing some services, the Senate aide said. The goal should be to find the most efficient and cost-effective solution, the aide added.
However, the document appears to leave the door open for a tough competition between Boeing and Airbus. The request "gives everybody a window and a possible victory to only two players," said Richard Aboulafia, an aircraft analyst at Teal Group. Other companies, including service providers Omega Air and Atlas Air, may have a "niche somewhere," he added.
In the rush to acquire new planes in 2003, the Air Force tried to lease Boeing KC-767s before reviewing other options. The $23.5 billion deal collapsed after congressional critics, led by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., forced the Pentagon to weigh alternatives to the Boeing aircraft.
The original tanker-lease deal collapsed in the biggest Pentagon procurement scandal in more than two decades, prompting the resignation of Air Force Secretary James Roche and convictions of two Boeing executives, ex-Air Force acquisition official Darleen Druyun and Michael Sears, the firm's chief financial officer.
The Air Force, which gave companies a June 9 deadline to respond to Tuesday's request, plans to release a draft request for proposals in September, followed by a formal proposal by January 2007. The contract award is expected next summer.
Given the high stakes of the program, as well as its checkered past, the tankers will likely generate "the highest ratio of paperwork to concrete results in the history of defense," Aboulafia said. "Everyone is going to make sure their t's are double crossed, and their i's are double-dotted."
NEXT STORY: Immigration bill awaits deal from Senate leaders