Senators challenge OMB's guidance on pre-sequester layoff notices

Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., is seeking an explanation from the administratio Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., is seeking an explanation from the administratio Charles Dharapak/AP
Two Republican senators have a few questions for the White House.

Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire are seeking an explanation from the administration over its move on Friday to prevent contractors facing sequestration cuts from issuing layoff notices required by law.

The senators say they are "seriously concerned" about an Office of Management and Budget memorandum and a Labor Department letter addressing the applicability of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.

"In particular, we are concerned about the authority of the executive branch to instruct private employers not to comply with federal law," the senators wrote to OMB Ccting Director Jeffrey Zients.

The WARN Act requires companies with 100 or more employees to give workers 60 days' notice before plant closings or mass layoffs. In this case, the Labor Department issued guidance in July saying that the layoff notices would be inappropriate because sequestration could be averted, National Journal reported. On Friday, OMB issued guidance saying that if sequestration occurs necessitating WARN Act notices and if the contractor followed Labor Department counsel, then resulting WARN Act liability costs could be covered by the contracting agency.

The senators take issue with both administration positions, and in particular, worry about the potential cost burden the administration might be undertaking.

"Although the precise amounts of the judgments and costs are unknown, they could potentially reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, if not billions of dollars, all of which would be paid for with taxpayers' dollars," the senators wrote.

Grassley and Ayotte say they want written answers and documents to their 14 questions by Oct. 8.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.