GSA revamps list of contractors banned from federal business

The General Services Administration on Monday announced plans to overhaul its database of private companies barred from federal work due to misconduct.

Federal agencies can suspend or debar contractors for various types of misconduct, including fraud, embezzlement and forgery. Suspension is temporary, while debarment can last three years or longer. GSA maintains an "excluded parties" database listing suspended or debarred companies.

But advocacy groups and some lawmakers say the list is not very useful to agencies because it lacks historical information on administrative or court proceedings against companies and any resulting suspensions or debarments. The database is also difficult to navigate, according to critics.

Under regulations proposed in the Dec. 1 Federal Register, agencies would enter information about suspended or debarred contractors directly onto the list, which GSA maintains. This would cut down on inaccuracies, since the data would not travel through as many hands, and would also ensure that the database contains more timely information, GSA officials said.

Currently it takes up to seven days for information from some agencies to be reflected on the list, according to GSA spokeswoman Mary Alice Johnson. The data travels by mail in some cases, and once it reaches GSA, it sits in a queue until an employee there has a chance to enter it.

About 30 agencies, including the Justice, Education, Transportation and State departments and the Army, Air Force and Defense Logistics Agency, already enter data directly into GSA's excluded parties list, Johnson said. But the draft regulations would make the practice mandatory at all agencies.

In addition, the proposed changes would increase the variety of data GSA shares with agencies, and would make the database more user-friendly. Agencies would be able to search GSA's files by entering in a contractor's name or the Social Security number of an individual bidding on government work.

The revamped excluded parties list also would include information about contractors' past exclusions from government work, Johnson said. Currently, procurement workers must file a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain this data, according to the Federal Register notice.

These changes address some concerns expressed by the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), a nonprofit watchdog group, about the excluded parties list. POGO, which maintains its own database to track lawsuits initiated against large contractors, contends that without access to reliable and thorough information on contractor misconduct, agencies cannot make informed decisions when awarding work to private companies.

The proposed changes would represent an improvement over the current system because they streamline the process of updating the database, make it more user-friendly, and give agencies access to information on companies' past wrongdoings, said Danielle Brian, POGO's executive director.

But "tinkering" with the excluded parties list will not address some of the larger problems with the government's suspension and debarment system, Brian said. "The next step is to be able to have suspension and debarment used more regularly for anything other than mom-and-pop shops," she said. POGO studies have shown that large contractors are rarely banned from government work despite repeated misconduct.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., also has criticized the excluded parties list, and in July, she introduced the 2003 Contractors Accountability Act (H.R. 2767), which would require GSA to maintain a central database with records dating back five years of any court or administrative proceedings brought against federal contractors, and any resulting debarments or suspensions.

The bill has not made it out of the House Government Reform Committee. Maloney introduced similar legislation previously, most recently as an amendment to the 2003 Services Acquisition Reform Act (H.R. 1837). In early May, the House Government Reform Committee defeated the amendment by a vote of 22 to 18.

GSA is accepting comments on the proposed suspension and debarment regulations until Jan. 30, 2004. Send comments by e-mail to, or mail them to:

General Services Administration, FAR Secretariat (MVA)
1800 F Street N.W., Room 4035
Attn.: Laurie Duarte
Washington, D.C. 20405

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.