One State Is Being Sued Over Obamacare Politics

Ricardo Reitmeyer/Shutterstock.com

Tennessee is being sued for depriving eligible residents of Medicaid coverage.

The changes to the state's Medicaid program, TennCare, following the implementation of the Affordable Care Act have resulted in thousands of individuals being blocked from coverage they are entitled to, according to alawsuit filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee in Nashville. And the firms involved argue it's because of politics related to the health care law.

"Tennessee officials are sacrificing the health of the state's most vulnerable citizens just to score political points," said Sam Brooke, staff attorney for the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is filing the lawsuit along with the Tennessee Justice Center and National Health Law Program. "They're throwing a monkey wrench into their own Medicaid program so they can demonize the federal government. People in dire need of medical care are being sacrificed."

Medicaid law requires applications to be adjudicated within 45 days, yet many residents in Tennessee have not received any response from TennCare in as long as three times that period, the lawsuit says. Furthermore, the state is not allowing hearings in the event of a denial or no determination, leaving applicants in limbo with no recourse to get coverage.

The organizations filing the suit say these delays are a result of changes to TennCare that were put into place following the Obamacare rollout. On Jan. 1, the state stopped accepting direct applications for coverage, instead requiring consumers to apply through HealthCare.gov—something they say the federal marketplace was never meant to handle alone.

If there are determination issues between the federal system and the state office, applicants are out of luck, because the state also ended in-person assistance last fall.

Tennessee is the only state without in-person guidance or an enrollment system of its own.

TennCare, however, places the blame on the federal government for any problems that have arisen.

"The state has not only shouldered its own responsibilities, but also has devoted substantial resources to mitigating problems arising from the federal marketplace flaws," TennCare Director Darin Gordon wrote in aletter to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services earlier this month. "A small percentage of applicants have had difficulty completing the enrollment process, but almost all of those problems have been the result of flaws in the federal government's HealthCare.gov website."

The remarks were a response to a request from CMS at the end of last month for a plan of how TennCare will meet Medicaid requirements. Similar letters were sent to five other states with large backlogs of Medicaid applications: Alaska, California, Kansas, Michigan, and Missouri.

Yet while the other states have taken measures to address the problem and reduce their backlogs, the suit's filers say, Tennessee has taken steps backward. CMS's only recourse aside from a slap on the wrist is to revoke Medicaid funding from the state—a last resort the suit's filers say no one wants, and one they hope to avoid through court intervention.

Like most red states, Tennessee has declined to participate in Medicaid expansion, but it is the first state in the country to face litigation over its Medicaid practices since the ACA went into effect.

(Image via Ricardo Reitmeyer/Shutterstock.com)

NEWSLETTER

Get daily news from Route Fifty

Top stories on how innovation is driving smarter government across the country.

FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.