McCain Says He Won't Back Homeland Security Nominee

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Sen. John McCain switched gears suddenly Wednesday, withdrawing his support for Jeh Johnson’s confirmation for secretary of the Homeland Security Department over a flap about stalled immigration reform.

At a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on Johnson’s confirmation, McCain, R-Ariz., started out reiterating positive comments he has made about Johnson, saying, “I’ve known you a number of years, and I’m very pleased you will be taking on these new responsibilities. I view you as an outstanding public servant. I’m confident that your confirmation process will be very smooth.”

But that happy talk disappeared abruptly when Johnson said he could not promise to give McCain information from DHS about what it would take to achieve 90 percent effective control of the U.S. border. The senator then did an abrupt about-face, saying Johnson’s demurral would cost his support for the DHS nomination.

“As we work …, the eight of us, to complete this comprehensive immigration [reform], which is stalled, as you know, in the House, ... one major reason why it’s stalled is because [of] a lack of confidence in border security,” McCain said. “I want to know if you will give this committee the exact metrics that are needed sector-by-sector so that we can attain 90 percent effectiveness on the border.”

McCain said that Congress has responsibilities to secure the border, and unless DHS helps it figure out how, it cannot do its job.

“We have our responsibilities here…. So as much as I admire and appreciate you, unless you can tell me that, you will give the information that this committee has the right to have, I cannot support your nomination,” McCain said.

When Johnson said he wanted to be helpful but couldn’t make a promise, McCain called that response unacceptable.

“Let the record show you will not give a yes or no answer. Therefore I will not support your nomination until I get a yes answer,” he said.

Johnson attempted to show he was trying.

“Before I commit unequivocally to your question—and part of me very much wants to do that—I think I need to talk to people at DHS.”

In an interview with National Journal Daily after the hearing, McCain said he did not believe Johnson would provide the information because the White House would not allow it.

“The White House, we are told, ... that when we were putting together comprehensive immigration reform that the White House told Homeland Security not to give us that information,” he said.

“I will not approve of his confirmation, because it is clearly information the Congress needs to make its decisions,” he added. “I’m not encouraging anybody. I act by myself on all of these things.”

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., told NJ Daily that he was unsatisfied with Johnson’s answers about Americans’ privacy rights regarding domestic drones and said he was undecided on whether he would back Johnson’s confirmation.

Still, lawmakers and analysts monitoring Johnson’s confirmation overwhelmingly expect to see the administration’s former drone lawyer, who is credited with paving the way for the repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, confirmed.

“When you are confirmed—I’m not going to say if—because you are going to be confirmed,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., the ranking member on the Homeland Security Committee, during the hearing.

“I personally want to thank you for stepping forward. I think it is the most difficult position of all of the Cabinet secretaries.… It is clear to me that you are an honorable man, … which is exactly what we want.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.