IRS Scrutinized Progressive Groups as Well as Tea Party

Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., has released redacted documents that he said showed IRS employees used political rhetoric in evaluating applications of progressive groups. Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., has released redacted documents that he said showed IRS employees used political rhetoric in evaluating applications of progressive groups. Charles Dharapak/AP

Newly released Internal Revenue Service documents show that “be on the lookout” lists the agency used to process applications for tax-exempt status included progressive groups as well as tea party organizations, a fact not communicated in the inspector general’s report that triggered the IRS scandal, a key House Democrat has said.

Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., ranking member of the Ways and Means Committee, has released redacted documents that he said showed IRS employees used political rhetoric in evaluating applications of progressive groups seeking tax-exempt status, in addition to conservatives.

Levin’s move came in response to the IRS’ 30-day internal review -- released Monday -- of the agency’s mishandling of the applications.

Levin also sent a letter to J. Russell George, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, saying that George “seriously erred” in failing to communicate this fact in his May audit and in subsequent congressional testimony. “The audit served as the basis and impetus for a wide range of congressional investigations and this new information shows that the foundation of those investigations is flawed in a fundamental way,” Levin said in a statement.

TIGTA’s report focused on applicants for tax-exempt status that the IRS flagged for potential political campaign intervention, a spokesman who declined to be named said in an email to Government Executive.

“We have identified other criteria that use names and policy positions to refer cases,” he said. “Although these criteria were not used to select cases for review of potential political campaign intervention, we are reviewing whether these criteria led to expanded scrutiny for other reasons, and why these criteria were implemented.”

TIGTA was preparing its response to Levin, the spokesman said.

Levin also asked Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich., to hold a hearing where the IG can explain the omission. Camp had already scheduled a hearing for Thursday to discuss the 30-day review released by acting IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel. In addition, Levin requested that the interviews with IRS employees “conducted to date be reevaluated and possibly supplemented in light of the information learned today.”

Though the May audit described the key words used for screening groups as “tea party,” “patriot,” and “9/12,” the new document includes a November 2010 BOLO list with a description of “progressives,” describing their “political activities” as follows:

“ Common thread is the word “progressive.” Activities appear to lean toward a new political party. Activities are partisan and appear anti-Republican. You see references to “blue” as being “progressive.” Applicants submit 1023. Their “progressive” activities appear to show that (c)(3) may not be appropriate.” .

Continuing the ongoing tit-for-tat between congressional staffs investigating the IRS matter, a Ways and Means spokeswoman issued a statement reminding reporters of an exchange during a June 4 hearing in which Democrats were given the chance to name progressive groups or call witnesses who were similarly targeted by the IRS, but they did not do so.

“It is one thing to flag a group, it is quite another to repeatedly target and abuse conservative groups,” the spokeswoman said. “Tea party groups were not just on a BOLO, they were (1) sent intrusive and inappropriate questions, (2) had their donors threatened with gift taxes and (3) had their confidential information leaked. The committee has welcomed all groups, regardless of affiliation, that feel they may have been targeted for extra scrutiny to come forward.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.