Census managers fired for falsifying population counts in Brooklyn

BROOKLYN, N.Y. -- The U.S. Census Bureau has fired two supervisors in a local New York field office after whistleblowers disclosed they were instructed to falsify population data, senior agency officials told a congressional panel on Monday. The former employees now are facing possible felony charges.

"This is deeply troubling," Bureau Director Robert Groves told members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee during a field hearing in downtown Brooklyn attended by several members of the New York congressional delegation. "I find it abhorrent to all of the principles underlying the work of the Census Bureau."

The incident occurred in June in the Brooklyn Northeast Local Census Office, an area that historically has been tough to count because of its large population, high percentage of difficult to access apartment complexes, and bevy of new immigrants and undocumented workers.

Groves told the committee the office manager and assistant manager for field operations -- neither of whom was identified at the hearing -- directed clerks and other staff to complete questionnaires using information found on a computer database known as FastData, rather than conduct personal interviews. The office operations supervisor refused to comply with the directive and resigned in protest.

Information on roughly 1,000 addresses was transcribed directly from database printouts onto the survey forms, officials said. When information was missing from the database, the manager told clerks to falsely record that the resident had refused to respond, said Commerce Department Inspector General Todd Zinser. Some clerks told the IG they were instructed to infer the number of residents associated with an address or to simply enter 1.

The practice not only is against Census regulations but likely would lead to inaccurate results. Groves said the database, which is supposed to be for quality assurance purposes, is filled with erroneous information and was meant to be used only to match phone numbers to addresses for potential follow-up inquiries. Access to FastData is restricted, but the assistant manager previously had worked in the quality assurance division and retained access privileges that were not authorized, officials testified.

An office clerk and the office supervisor who resigned later reported the misconduct to the IG. The database left an electronic footprint of its usage and the two supervisors were fired on June 18. The IG also has forwarded the case to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York for a possible felony charge of falsifying Census records.

"I have reasonable grounds to believe that laws were violated," Zinser said. The criminal referral is the first related to possible fraud by supervisors during the 2010 count, he said. Investigators, however, are continuing to follow up on about 40 allegations related to Census irregularities.

Groves said even if the whistleblowers had not come forward, the behavior likely would have been discovered during mandatory re-interviews of residents.

Cleaning up from the reported violations in Brooklyn has proved both costly and complicated.

The bureau directed office management to re-enumerate all cases that involved the database, including addresses that might have been checked prior to the most recent incident. Any cases supervisors completed after the whistleblower allegations were filed also were reworked, Groves said. And officials conducted an independent investigation to ensure that FastData was not used in an adjacent Brooklyn office.

In total, the office was required to redo more than 4,200 cases, or about 2 percent of Brooklyn's population. The IG puts the cost of the effort at approximately $50,000 while Groves suggested it would be closer to $250,000.

"Anything that compromises the integrity of the 2010 Census is unacceptable -- there's too much at stake here," said Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee whose home district includes much of Brooklyn. "We must do everything we can to make sure the final count is accurate and complete."

But new allegations made during the second recount have raised even more questions about the management and operations of the two Brooklyn field offices.

A second whistleblower complaint filed in early July found that enumerators were entering estimated counts for households that appeared inhabited but for which they could not obtain information, a violation of procedures, Groves said. The staffers allegedly entered survey data based on observable information, such as the presence of pets or names on a mailbox, investigators found.

The bureau now is conducting a third recount for some of the Brooklyn addresses, as well as beefing up its training techniques and investigating whether similar shortcuts were taken elsewhere.

Brooklyn is no stranger to Census problems. During the 1980 count, a local Census office was burned down as a result of arson, destroying virtually all documents for one of the poorest regions of the borough.

In the 2000 census, Brooklyn had a participation rate of 52 percent. The figure is expected to be 55 percent for the 2010 count, compared to the national participation rate of 72 percent.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.