Watchdog: Agencies Struggle to Account for Senior Exec Training Costs


Federal agencies, which spent some $57 million on senior executive training from 2008 through 2012, could improve reporting of cost data if the Office of Personnel Management set tighter timetables, an audit found.

Since 2006, chief human capital officers have been required to report cost data such as travel expenses and training course materials provided by management experts at facilities including Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and OPM’s Federal Executive Institute, according to a new report  from the Government Accountability Office.

But GAO’s yearlong audit found that “many agencies are not yet accurately and completely reporting” the information, and OPM’s efforts to improve accuracy are hindered by “not establishing a timeframe for improving the reliability of executive training cost data,” GAO stated in the report.

The report was released on Tuesday, the same day President Obama unveiled his fiscal 2015 budget document, which proposes investing more money in training federal workers.

Auditors found that “OPM is not sharing lessons learned from agencies that have experience assessing executive training impact on agency mission,” though the government’s HR agency has issued guidance on the subject. Agency human capital officers said they needed additional help from OPM on managing the time, costs and complexity of reporting executive training data.

In a yearlong audit that included focus groups and in-depth interviews at the departments of Energy, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, GAO also found that senior executives in general valued in-person training more than individualized online training, though several of those interviewed mentioned that large gatherings had limits as well.

GAO recommended that OPM establish interim milestones for meeting with agencies to address training data deficiencies and establish timeframes for improving the reliability of agency data. It also advocated greater sharing among agencies of methods for evaluating executive training with an eye toward using them governmentwide.

OPM generally agreed, but noted its own progress in issuing training guidance.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.