Social Security May Have Overpaid Disability Claims by $1.29 Billion

Bradley C Bower/AP file photo

Roughly 36,000 individuals may have received Social Security disability payments for which they did not qualify, at a cost to the government of $1.29 billion, the Government Accountability Office reported.

In an audit released Friday to Sens. Tom Carper, D-Del., Carl Levin, D-Mich., and Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., GAO said that the “potential cash benefit overpayments” made by the Social Security Administration as of January 2013 may have gone to recipients who were already working.

A similar report in 2010 found a higher number of possible improper payments, totaling $1.62 billion, or 1.27 percent of total payouts under the Disability Insurance program.

Under the program established in 1956, applicants who claim they are unable to work due to a long-term disability are required to go through a five-month waiting period during which they may not earn more than $1,000 a month. There is a subsequent nine-month trial work period.

More than 10 million disability insurance beneficiaries received cash payments totaling more than $128 billion in fiscal 2011, not counting Medicare payments, “and the program is poised to grow further as the baby boom generation ages,” the report said.

Auditors over a 15-month period compared SSA disability insurance data against the National Directory of New Hires and found discrepancies, though they could not pin down a precise number. “SSA uses its enforcement operation to generate alerts for potentially disqualifying earnings, but the agency's enforcement operation does not generate alerts for earnings that occur in all months of the waiting period, which allows potentially disqualifying work activity to remain undetected,” GAO wrote. “SSA officials stated that modifying its enforcement operation could be costly, but the agency has not assessed the costs of doing so.”

GAO recommended that SSA assess the costs and feasibility of establishing a mechanism to detect potentially disqualifying earnings during all months of the waiting period and implement the mechanism.

SSA concurred, but said, “GAO did not replicate the process with which” SSA makes determinations for eligibility, “and GAO made assumptions that may not be consistent with our policy.” Hence SSA is seeking additional GAO data before fully responding.

GAO stood by its methods.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.