IRS under fire for making taxpayer identity fraud a low priority

Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La. Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La. Harry Hamburg/AP

Internal Revenue Service managers “created an environment which discourages employees from detecting fraudulent applications” for taxpayer identification numbers, risking billions of dollars in improper tax refunds, auditors said.

None of the IRS’ subdivisions made detecting fraud a priority because doing so would eliminate some applications and maintaining a large inventory of applications provides job security, according to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.

The report prompted Rep. Charles Boustany Jr., R-La., chairman of the Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight, to write a letter to IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman demanding he identify which IRS manager made the decision to deemphasize the significance of errors in applications for taxpayer identification numbers. Boustany complained that “beyond training and employee incentives, IRS management has chosen to shut down processes and practices with proven success in identifying fraudulent [identification number] applications.”

Since 1996, the IRS has allowed taxpayers who are not eligible for Social Security to apply for a taxpayer identification number. In tax processing year 2011, the IRS handled more than 2.9 million such applications and made tax refunds of $6.8 billion.

In response to complaints from an unnamed U.S. senator and House member who heard from two internal whistleblowers, TIGTA reviewed the agency’s procedures for detecting fraud in ITIN applications. It concluded that IRS management has not established “adequate internal controls to detect and prevent the assignment of an ITIN to individuals submitting questionable applications” involving identity and foreign status, noted the report, dated June 16 but released Wednesday.

Interviews with IRS staff revealed that managers had “eliminated successful processes used to identify questionable ITIN application fraud patterns and schemes.” IRS management indicated that no function, including criminal investigation and the Accounts Management Taxpayer Assurance Program, “is interested in dealing with ITIN application fraud,” the auditors said.

Boustany’s letter underlined the IG’s examples of suspicious details in identification number applications: 154 mailing addresses were used 1,000 or more times; 10 individual addresses were used for filing 53,994 tax returns, resulting in the processing of $86.4 million in fraudulent refunds; 10 bank accounts received 23,560 tax refunds totaling more than $16 million; and a Michigan address where the IRS had previously rejected an ITIN application  went on to receive 640 separate refunds totaling $1.5 million.

“This report is shocking,” Boustany said in a statement. “It’s one thing if the IRS tries to catch fraud and fails, but it’s quite another when management apparently takes steps to weaken program integrity.”

IRS managers said they had investigated the schemes described in the report and taken some action. Of nine recommendations TIGTA made for creating new controls, the IRS, after reviewing a draft, agreed with seven and made plans for changes. The other two are still under consideration.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.