USPS managers reach salary agreement

Bob Child/AP

Postmasters will not see pay-for-performance increases in their 2012 paychecks, according to a new agreement with the U.S. Postal Service, reached after months of discussion.

The deal withholds postmasters’ and Postal Career Executive Service members’ pay-for-performance program ratings from salary determinations for fiscal 2011 and 2012. Pay-for-performance determinations are normally made at the end of a fiscal year and are not reflected in paychecks until January of the next calendar year, USPS spokesman Mark Saunders said.

In fiscal 2013, pay-for-performance determinations will be subject to a USPS review of compensation practices and other factors also will be considered, such as the state of the nation’s economy. At that time, the performance ratings either will be suspended or applied to salary determinations. Beginning in fiscal 2014 and 2015, pay-for-performance ratings could once again be applied to salary determinations, according to the agreement.

Pay for performance has been a contentious issue between USPS and the National Association of Postmasters of the United States and the National League of Postmasters -- the groups representing top postal employees. Although management is not permitted to form unions or bargain with USPS, the Postal Service still must consult with these associations regarding pay and benefits policies.

In addition, the new agreement raises minimums and maximums for postmaster salaries by 1 percent in fiscal 2012, 1.5 percent in fiscal 2013, and 2 percent in fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015. This represents a 6.5 percent increase over four years.

The postmaster organizations also agreed to hikes in health plan contributions to bring USPS managers into parity with other federal employees. Currently, most feds pay 28 percent of their health care plans, with the government paying the balance. USPS contributions for postmasters’ plans will remain steady at more than 80 percent in 2011 and 2012, and then taper off until fiscal 2015, when the Postal Service will pay 72 percent and managers will contribute 28 percent, according to the new agreement.

Health plans, however, are at issue in postal reform discussions and could be altered again before the current agreement expires. The USPS five-year plan to solvency includes a request to leave the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan, but the Senate does not favor this approach.

Pay for USPS senior managers came up during debate on the postal reform bill that passed the Senate in April.

“Congress felt that even top management should feel the pain of the cuts going on in the post office. Amendments were placed in the bill that cut the top management of the organization and amendments were introduced to get postal employees’ health care contributions in line with the federal government,” the National League of Postmasters said.

The postmasters organization acknowledged that the new agreement with USPS is “far from the perfect package,” but still backed the deal.

“We believe it is fair to all parties and in line with the financial difficulties facing the Postal Service while recognizing the hard work of postmasters,” NLPM said.

Clarification: An earlier version of this story described increases to postmasters' minimum and maximum salaries as salary increases; in fact, the change results in an automatic salary increases only for postmasters who earn the minimum salary.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Forecasting Cloud's Future

    Conversations with Federal, State, and Local Technology Leaders on Cloud-Driven Digital Transformation

  • The Big Data Campaign Trail

    With everyone so focused on security following recent breaches at federal, state and local government and education institutions, there has been little emphasis on the need for better operations. This report breaks down some of the biggest operational challenges in IT management and provides insight into how agencies and leaders can successfully solve some of the biggest lingering government IT issues.

  • Communicating Innovation in Federal Government

    Federal Government spending on ‘obsolete technology’ continues to increase. Supporting the twin pillars of improved digital service delivery for citizens on the one hand, and the increasingly optimized and flexible working practices for federal employees on the other, are neither easy nor inexpensive tasks. This whitepaper explores how federal agencies can leverage the value of existing agency technology assets while offering IT leaders the ability to implement the kind of employee productivity, citizen service improvements and security demanded by federal oversight.

  • IT Transformation Trends: Flash Storage as a Strategic IT Asset

    MIT Technology Review: Flash Storage As a Strategic IT Asset For the first time in decades, IT leaders now consider all-flash storage as a strategic IT asset. IT has become a new operating model that enables self-service with high performance, density and resiliency. It also offers the self-service agility of the public cloud combined with the security, performance, and cost-effectiveness of a private cloud. Download this MIT Technology Review paper to learn more about how all-flash storage is transforming the data center.

  • Ongoing Efforts in Veterans Health Care Modernization

    This report discusses the current state of veterans health care


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.