USPS pay-for-performance system called into question

The U.S. Postal Service has manipulated pay-for-performance ratings for its postmasters, resulting in lower payouts than expected, according to union leaders.

In an Aug. 27 letter to USPS Inspector General David Williams, National Association of Postmasters of the United States President Robert Rapoza and National League of Postmasters President Mark Strong said the Postal Service has failed to address concerns about the management of its pay-for-performance program. The agency hasn't responded to requests to investigate complaints, they wrote.

Rapoza said 250 NAPUS members submitted appeals on pay-for-performance ratings released on Feb. 5. According to Rapoza, the agency failed to have face-to-face meetings with postmasters to discuss evaluations.

"Our request for investigation is not based simply on monetary payouts, it's based on a manipulation of the process where we believe several of our membership did not receive ratings based on what their accomplishments were," he said. "We believe they [the ratings] may have been lowered by higher-ups after they received the original rating. We've asked them to enforce administrative rules from within."

Rapoza said he has talked with Postal Service officials to resolve the problem, but the agency sent the associations' concerns back to the evaluators who provided the original ratings. NAPUS and the National League of Postmasters are requesting an IG investigation.

"Because of the ratings that postmasters received, they were labeled as noncontributors and for one thing we'd like to see the noncontributory rating go away," Rapoza said. "What we want out of this is to ensure the Postal Service follows their own rules."

Mark Saunders, a spokesman for the Postal Service, said the agency disagrees with the letter's assertions. A spokesman for the inspector general's office said an audit of the pay-for-performance program and the postmasters' concerns is under way.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Going Agile:Revolutionizing Federal Digital Services Delivery

    Here’s one indication that times have changed: Harriet Tubman is going to be the next face of the twenty dollar bill. Another sign of change? The way in which the federal government arrived at that decision.

  • Cyber Risk Report: Cybercrime Trends from 2016

    In our first half 2016 cyber trends report, SurfWatch Labs threat intelligence analysts noted one key theme – the interconnected nature of cybercrime – and the second half of the year saw organizations continuing to struggle with that reality. The number of potential cyber threats, the pool of already compromised information, and the ease of finding increasingly sophisticated cybercriminal tools continued to snowball throughout the year.

  • Featured Content from RSA Conference: Dissed by NIST

    Learn more about the latest draft of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology guidance document on authentication and lifecycle management.

  • GBC Issue Brief: The Future of 9-1-1

    A Look Into the Next Generation of Emergency Services

  • GBC Survey Report: Securing the Perimeters

    A candid survey on cybersecurity in state and local governments

  • The New IP: Moving Government Agencies Toward the Network of The Future

    Federal IT managers are looking to modernize legacy network infrastructures that are taxed by growing demands from mobile devices, video, vast amounts of data, and more. This issue brief discusses the federal government network landscape, as well as market, financial force drivers for network modernization.

  • eBook: State & Local Cybersecurity

    CenturyLink is committed to helping state and local governments meet their cybersecurity challenges. Towards that end, CenturyLink commissioned a study from the Government Business Council that looked at the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of state and local leaders around the cybersecurity issue. The results were surprising in a number of ways. Learn more about their findings and the ways in which state and local governments can combat cybersecurity threats with this eBook.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.