Space agency defends acquisitions processes

More consistent use of "knowledge-based acquisition processes" could help NASA complete projects on time and on budget, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office.

The report (GAO-06-218), published this week, recommended that NASA enhance the use of information about project status in reviews to determine how work should move forward.

So-called knowledge-based acquisition processes are management procedures designed to bring relevant information about all aspects of a project into key system and product decisions. GAO said changes to the agency's knowledge-based acquisition framework will be critical as it prepares to spend more than $100 billion to meet initial goals of the president's 2004 Vision for Space Exploration, and as it takes measures to address a history of cost, schedule and performance problems in major projects.

Consistency in project decision-making would aid NASA in balancing multiple missions, such as human space flight, pure science and aeronautics, the report stated. But Allen Li, GAO's director of acquisition and sourcing management, said in remarks presenting the findings that some of NASA's 10 centers are resistant to a system of standardized criteria because "they feel it could be overly prescriptive" and unrealistic given the "unique nature" of the work being done.

The congressional auditors recommended that NASA require information-based decision reviews for ongoing projects as they transition from design into implementation and production, at which stage key technologies would be assessed for whether they are sufficiently mature to proceed. It also recommended that projects entering production phases should be assessed for the potential to be manufactured to cost, schedule and quality targets.

In a written response, NASA Deputy Administrator Shana Dale agreed with GAO's points but defended the agency's practices. Many of the recommendations are already practiced at the agency, but are not reflected in policy documents, she said.

She also noted the nontraditional nature of many of NASA's projects. "Very few NASA projects enter into a traditional production process," she wrote. "Most NASA missions fabricate one-of-a-kind spacecraft using a proto-flight or very small quantity approach."

Dale said that critical design reviews, one of the minimum set of reviews required for such projects, would be modified to include success criteria appropriate to knowledge-based decisions.

In his concluding comments, Li called NASA's plans to address the recommendations "a positive step" and said they would be helpful in ensuring that less experienced project managers are clear on unwritten, institutionalized practices. But he warned that project officials should be held accountable for using in their decision-making processes the information newly available through updated success criteria.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.