Agencies to receive more money, scrutiny, OMB chief says

Under the 2003 budget plan the Bush administration will submit to Congress next month, federal program managers can expect funding increases, but also more oversight of their operations, according to Office of Management and Budget Director Mitch Daniels.

Daniels outlined the administration's goals Thursday in remarks to federal finance and accounting personnel at a Washington conference sponsored by the Association of Government Accountants. In general, programs that contribute to national defense and homeland security will see substantial increases in funding. Most other programs will see slight spending increases, Daniels said. The new spending will come with a catch, however. Agencies will be under substantially more pressure to demonstrate how well their programs are performing. Daniels argued that previous budgets, which were organized by function or objective, blurred the responsibilities of specific agencies for achieving those objectives. The administration's 2003 budget will be organized by agency. That change "will begin the process of separating programs that work from programs that don't," Daniels said. As such, the budget "will take a long step forward toward governing with accountability." Additionally, future funding will depend on the ability of agencies to document the return on taxpayer investment, Daniels said. Presently, agencies lack meaningful financial data and in some cases, meaningful goals, he said. "We want to know which programs are producing a good return on investment. What do Americans get for their money?" Daniels said. Before agencies can answer those questions, many will need to substantially improve their finance and accounting operations, something most have struggled with for years. The administration intends to turn up the heat on those efforts as well. Beginning in 2003, agencies will be required to account for the full cost of their employee retirement programs--something few agencies currently do, an omission that obscures the true cost of operations. While administration officials say they are committed to improving management, substantial progress will be difficult to achieve. The Defense Department, the agency responsible for half of federal spending outside entitlement programs, is, in its own assessment, several years away from being able to balance its books. At the same time Daniels was describing a new era of accountability to his Washington audience, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was telling reporters at a Pentagon briefing that financial management was woefully inadequate at the department. Defense officials estimate it will be another year before they even have a blueprint for fixing the system. Another challenge for the administration is the fact that much of the work agencies do is difficult to quantify, something Daniels acknowledged: "Many of the thing government does are not susceptible to clear, crisp measurement. But difficulty cannot be an excuse for inaction."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.