OMB chief urges Congress to cut funding for mismanaged programs

Office of Management and Budget Chief Mitch Daniels on Tuesday urged Congress to use the 1993 Government Performance and Results Act to identify mismanaged, wasteful or duplicative government programs, with an eye to cutting their funding as the appropriations process moves forward.

Daniels, who is entering his first appropriations cycle as the Bush administration's point man on the budget, said, "The burden is on Congress and especially the appropriations process" to tie performance and results to future funding.

"Are we going to continue to fund the same old tired programs? ... There have to be some consequences," Daniels said.

The OMB director told reporters that even with control of the Senate shifting to Democrats, Congress and the White House can collaborate on an "orderly, responsible appropriations process" and complete action on the fiscal 2002 spending bills on time and within the $661.3 billion allocated for discretionary spending in the budget resolution.

But most Democrats, among them new Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., and new Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Byrd, D-W.V., opposed the budget resolution partly because they said it shortchanged spending on domestic priorities.

Daniels also welcomed the efforts of Sens. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, and Jim Bunning, R-Ky., to bolster the President's hand, should he choose to veto spending bills he deems too expensive. He said the "spirit of enforcing budget discipline is helpful wherever it manifests itself."

Voinovich and Bunning hope to collect the signatures of 34 senators--enough to sustain a presidential veto--on a letter pledging their support for enforcing the spending limits set in the budget resolution.

Daniels stopped short of threatening hypothetical vetoes in the President's name. But when asked what Bush will do if Congress adds new spending to the nearly $7 billion fiscal 2001 supplemental the administration sent to Capitol Hill last Friday, Daniels responded, "We would advise them not to do that."

He stressed that the administration remains flexible about the composition of the supplemental, but not its overall price tag.

"The lid is the lid," he said.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.