Repealed contractor ethics rule may not have caught offenders

A short-lived contractor ethics rule would likely have caught few lawbreakers, according to a new General Accounting Office report.

A Federal Acquisition Regulation rule, dubbed "blacklisting" by critics, required federal contractors to meet certain labor, environmental and ethics standards. The rule was implemented in the last days of the Clinton administration and subsequently revoked by the Bush administration because officials said it was too stringent and too burdensome for contracting officials.

According to GAO, if the blacklisting rule had survived, many of the agencies identified during its investigation might have drifted under the radar because settlements do not have to be reported under the rule. In its report, GAO investigated the number of businesses awarded contracts of $100,000 or more in fiscal 2000 that had violated areas of law specified in the now-defunct blacklisting rule. Of the contractors involved in GAO's study, 3,403 were involved in 6,705 cases that were settled. In most of those cases, the contractors did not admit guilt or wrongdoing, GAO found.

"Few contractors in our review would have actually had to report past violations," the report (GAO-03-163) concluded. "Additionally, contracting officers would face significant difficulties in verifying or obtaining contractor compliance history information."

According to GAO, the contractor ended up taking corrective action in situations where the parties settled, assuring compliance with the law and agreeing to make some form of payment to the government.

The watchdog agency determined that 39 of 16,819 contractors would have violated the blacklisting rule, if it hadn't been repealed. The businesses identified by GAO held approximately $855 million in government contracts.

Of those 39 contractors, GAO found that seven businesses were convicted in federal court of crimes; five businesses suffered federal judgments in civil court; and administrative law judges, boards or commissions issued adverse decisions against 27 businesses.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.