Management Matters Management MattersManagement Matters
Practical advice for federal leaders on managing people, processes and projects.

A Test of Leadership

ARCHIVES
Last August, President Obama announced an "innovation competition" at the Veterans Benefits Administration. He challenged employees to come up with ideas to cut applications backlogs, slash wait times for decisions and get benefits to veterans faster.

Clearly, the agency's employees have ideas. They submitted 3,000 of them.

Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki in February announced 10 winners whose ideas will be implemented. Well, actually only five will be implemented in the short term. The other five have been "identified for future implementation." Translation: if VA finds some money to fund the efforts, then it will follow up.

The less costly ideas slated for immediate action include a proposal from one regional office to align employee standards with departmental goals and another to establish an expedited claims process for veterans whose service-related disabilities have gotten worse.

Both are worthwhile ideas, as are the other three that will be implemented immediately and the five that could, some day, be acted upon.

But what about the other 2,990 suggestions? Employees throughout VBA took the time to submit proposals to improve operations. Some of them probably were not great ideas. But many of them probably were. Will they be ignored?

Leaving employees' good ideas for improving operations to gather dust in a suggestion box won't do much to boost morale. Indeed, it will increase cynicism among employees that managers' requests for input amounted to little more than gimmicks.

That cynicism will extend to the customers of the agency -- veterans -- if time goes by and they see the same old-same old: extensive backlogs, long waiting periods and delayed benefits. The five ideas that are going to be implemented might improve service for some veterans, but none of the ideas represents sweeping, fundamental change that will improve service dramatically for most veterans.

Employee suggestion programs like VBA's innovation competition sometimes are seen as a test of rank-and-file workers' ability to come up with great ideas. The truth is employee suggestion programs are also a test of managers' ability and willingness to follow through on their promises. Too often, managers fail that test.

Good ideas for improving operations often cost money that organizations don't have. Others don't cost much money but require a change in operations that organizational leaders are unwilling to make. A few ideas are controversial, with some leaders supporting them and others adamantly opposed.

Once managers have asked for their employees' ideas they should have an honest discussion with those employees about the barriers to implementation. Leaving proposals on the shelf is a failure of leadership. If managers know that funding and other barriers will prevent them from making the most of employee suggestions, then perhaps they shouldn't seek them in the first place.

Brian Friel covered management and human resources at Government Executive for six years and is now a National Journal staff correspondent.

 

Brian Friel is founder of One Nation Analytics, an independent research, analytics and consulting firm for the federal market.

FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

    Download
  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.