Disaster aid offsets still popular among congressional Republicans

From Hurricane Irene-related flooding on the Eastern Seaboard to the devastating wildfires in Texas, natural disasters have loomed large in the public consciousness in recent weeks.

In this week's National Journal Congressional Insiders Poll, Republican Congressional Insiders are maintaining a nearly united front in demanding that any disaster relief funds allocated by Congress must be offset by spending cuts elsewhere in the budget.

Some 86 percent of Republicans surveyed said they believe that any federal disaster aid allocated by Congress must be offset by spending cuts elsewhere in the budget.

Republican members of Congress expressed concern about debts and deficits.

"We cannot afford to treat any new Washington spending differently with respect to offsetting its cost with corresponding budget cuts," said one Republican lawmaker.

"Endless borrowing will lead to a disaster," said another.

"Our national debt does not distinguish," added a third.

Some Republican respondents suggested that Washington should have been planning ahead for the possibility of disaster needs.

"Remember the work of the late U.S. Sen. Paul Coverdell, R-Ga., on this issue," said one Republican member of Congress. "We know every year that we will have massive natural disasters and can easily budget from past expenditures."

Another agreed, saying, "We should budget it as contingency spending and, if that's not enough, cut elsewhere. That is what families do."

Democratic Congressional Insiders reacted with dismay to the idea that aid might be delayed by negotiations over spending.

"This is why the emergency designation exists," said one. "To hold aid hostage to another budget fight would be unconscionable."

"That is dumb," said another. "We pay for emergencies all the time. Why is this different? This cut, cut, cut the budget is getting out of hand."

Several Democratic Insiders expressed the opinion that the urgency of the need should outweigh spending concerns.

"It's always better to pay for the actions we take," said one Democratic member of Congress. "But in the case of suffering Americans, we shouldn't let political posturing delay the aid and support we are obligated to deliver."

Another echoed that point, saying, "It's not ideal, but we simply can't leave people hanging at a time like this."

One Republican Congressional Insider felt offsets were necessary to curb abuse of the budgeting process. "Congress has been gaming the 'emergency' bills for too long. Time to budget - and pay - for them."

But a Democratic Insider found hypocrisy in the debate, stating, "We have no problem sending billions in 'emergency funding' to fight unwinnable wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, with no offsets whatsoever. Why can't we do the same for our own needy Americans who have had their homes, farms, and businesses completely destroyed by flooding?"

The National Journal Congressional Insiders Poll is a regular anonymous survey of Democratic and Republican Members of Congress.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.