Army Corps chief defends employees accused of data-rigging

Lt. Gen. Robert B. Flowers, the head of the Army Corps of Engineers, Tuesday defended Corps employees involved in a controversial waterway navigation project during a hearing before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee. The Army asked the National Academy of Sciences to evaluate the validity of the Corps' cost-benefit analysis that studied navigation improvements to the Mississippi and Illinois rivers, following a whistleblower's allegations of data-rigging last February. The academy will release its report Wednesday. While Flowers accepted the Army inspector general's finding last November that top Corps officials manipulated data in the massive navigation project, Flowers defended the integrity of the individuals involved. "It is not in the character of any of those officers to do anything for personal gain," said Flowers. A Nov. 13 report from the Army inspector general said top Corps officials changed data in a cost-benefit analysis studying navigation improvements to the Mississippi and Illinois rivers to justify the project's $1 billion price tag. The report also said there were "strong indications that institutional bias [favoring large-scale construction projects] might extend throughout the Corps." "The Army IG's findings raise some serious questions on how the Corps runs its operation," said Sen. Pete V. Domenici, R-N.M., chairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, at Tuesday's hearing. Two of the officials involved are now retired, and the third is working at a different command as part of his regular rotation. Flowers took over command of the Corps from Lt. Gen. Joe N. Ballard last August, before the inspector general's findings were released. When Domenici pressed Flowers on the Corps' efforts to address the issues raised by the inspector general, Flowers said he will submit his recommendations to the new Army Secretary and assistant secretary for civil works when they are appointed. Flowers' report on the inspector general's findings is due at the end of June. "I owe it to them [the new Army Secretary and assistant secretary for civil works] to sit down and go over the findings before I bring forward any recommendations," said Flowers. The Corps' navigation project on the Mississippi and Illinois rivers has been put on hold until June 2001. Flowers said the Corps will work with other federal agencies on how to improve the project and will incorporate the National Academy of Science's findings. The project is slated for completion in July 2002. "I take the issues surrounding the Army Corps of Engineers seriously, and I am making the changes necessary to insure the continued integrity of the civil works planning process, so that the Corps of Engineers can continue to fulfill its role in addressing the many water resource needs of this great country," Flowers said. Flowers said he has reached out to many of his organization's stakeholders, including members of Congress. The inspector general's investigation grew out of allegations made in February 2000 by Donald C. Sweeney, an economist with the Corps and the original technical manager of the waterway project. Sweeney told the Office of Special Counsel, the independent agency responsible for investigating whistleblower complaints, that some Corps officials violated Army regulations when they pressured employees to alter cost-benefit data.
Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

    Download
  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

    Download
  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

    Download
  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.