Alternative Dispute Resolution

PROCUREMENT REFORM GUIDE

Alternative Dispute Resolution

In 1990, Congress passed the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Act to provide methods of resolving disputes that are less contentious and less expensive than traditional contract litigation, such as mediation and arbitration. The Office of Federal Procurement Policy has encouraged agencies to use ADR techniques as a means of reducing the amount of money and time spent resolving contract disputes through traditional litigation.

The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act extends the 1990 ADR Act, which was to expire in 1995, to 1999. Agencies and vendors that choose not to use ADR techniques now are required to explain why in writing.

"Broad implementation of ADR means increased productivity because parties can focus more attention and resources on operations by minimizing diversions to the ancillary processes of resolving disputes," says MCI's Tim Long, chairman of the Council of Federal Information Technology, a trade association that has actively promoted alternative dispute resolution.

In a joint project last May with the Administrative Conference of the United States, OFPP secured pledges from 24 agencies to use ADR techniques. In addition, six agencies made specific promises to use ADR in 60 contracts valued at $1.4 billion. Since then, the Internal Revenue Service has pledged to use ADR for an additional contract worth $1.3 billion.

Of particular interest is the ADR technique known as partnering, in which contracting parties meet after awards have been made but before work has begun on a project to identify expectations and set goals. The meetings usually take the form of two-day workshops held in neutral retreat facilities.

The Army Corps of Engineers was the first federal agency to use partnering techniques five years ago. Not one of the 200 construction contracts the Corps has awarded since then has been litigated.

"Partnering enables contracting parties to prevent disputes by forming non-adversarial relationships," says Frank Carr, the Corps' chief trial attorney. "By sitting down at the start of a contract and developing a charter, parties can build trust and respect."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
FROM OUR SPONSORS
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Close [ x ] More from GovExec
 
 

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from GovExec.com.
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

    Download
  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

    Download
  • Federal IT Applications: Assessing Government's Core Drivers

    In order to better understand the current state of external and internal-facing agency workplace applications, Government Business Council (GBC) and Riverbed undertook an in-depth research study of federal employees. Overall, survey findings indicate that federal IT applications still face a gamut of challenges with regard to quality, reliability, and performance management.

    Download
  • PIV- I And Multifactor Authentication: The Best Defense for Federal Government Contractors

    This white paper explores NIST SP 800-171 and why compliance is critical to federal government contractors, especially those that work with the Department of Defense, as well as how leveraging PIV-I credentialing with multifactor authentication can be used as a defense against cyberattacks

    Download
  • Toward A More Innovative Government

    This research study aims to understand how state and local leaders regard their agency’s innovation efforts and what they are doing to overcome the challenges they face in successfully implementing these efforts.

    Download
  • From Volume to Value: UK’s NHS Digital Provides U.S. Healthcare Agencies A Roadmap For Value-Based Payment Models

    The U.S. healthcare industry is rapidly moving away from traditional fee-for-service models and towards value-based purchasing that reimburses physicians for quality of care in place of frequency of care.

    Download
  • GBC Flash Poll: Is Your Agency Safe?

    Federal leaders weigh in on the state of information security

    Download

When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.