Commerce, Prisons Bureau at High Risk for Losing Email

The Commerce Department is housed in DC's Herbert C. Hoover Building. The Commerce Department is housed in DC's Herbert C. Hoover Building. Flickr user ncindc

The National Archives and Records Administration since 2013 has been directing, surveying and training agency employees in the use of its records management program called Capstone. An Archives spokeswoman told Government Executive, “The preservation of all federal records by agencies is an ongoing priority for the National Archives. Electronic Records are a growing portion of these records.”

Archives uses a questionnaire to determine whether federal agencies are compliant with the law and then reports the results to the Office of Management and Budget.

But that survey stresses processes, training and performance goals -- it does not specifically ask about notifications of computer crashes. And it does not produce 100 percent compliance. For the fiscal 2012 survey, the latest, 281 agencies received the self-assessment, but only 241 responded. Among the nonrespondents in 2012 were the Agriculture Department’s Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, the Commerce Department’s Economic Development Administration, and the Defense Department’s U.S Army Corp of Engineers.

The portion of agencies that report having policies and procedures for email records with a retention period longer than 180 days remains unchanged at 68 percent, the report said.

The Archives’ summary of the self-assessment ranks the agencies’ compliance on a 100-point scale, with low risk being 90-100, moderate risk 60-89, and high risk from 0-59. Among those at lowest risk of losing records, scoring 100 points, are the Pentagon’s Missile Defense agency, the Interior Department’s Bureau of Reclamation, the Agriculture Department’s Farm Credit Administration, and the  U.S. Secret Service. Interestingly, the Internal Revenue Service scores 99 points, putting it at low risk for losing email, a ranking at odds with the current scandal.

Among those at highest risk are Commerce's department-level operations (47), Army Forces Command (15), the Justice Department’s Federal Bureau of Prisons (9), the Government Printing Office (6) and the National Endowment for the Humanities (6).  

While the data shows some signs of improvement over previous years, many agencies still do not transfer eligible permanent records to NARA according to their approved records schedules,” the survey analysts found. “Two-thirds of respondent agencies report that they transfer eligible permanent non-electronic records to the National Archives, but fewer than half -- 41 percent -- report that they transfer eligible permanent electronic records.”

Overall, “NARA is pleased with the progress federal agencies have made in managing their records,” the NARA report said. “However, there continues to be room for improvement.”

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by Brocade

    Best of 2016 Federal Forum eBook

    Earlier this summer, Federal and tech industry leaders convened to talk security, machine learning, network modernization, DevOps, and much more at the 2016 Federal Forum. This eBook includes a useful summary highlighting the best content shared at the 2016 Federal Forum to help agencies modernize their network infrastructure.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    GBC Flash Poll Series: Merger & Acquisitions

    Download this GBC Flash Poll to learn more about federal perspectives on the impact of industry consolidation.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    A DevOps Roadmap for the Federal Government

    This GBC Report discusses how DevOps is steadily gaining traction among some of government's leading IT developers and agencies.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.

  • Sponsored by CDW-G

    Joint Enterprise Licensing Agreements

    Read this eBook to learn how defense agencies can achieve savings and efficiencies with an Enterprise Software Agreement.

  • Sponsored by Cloudera

    Government Forum Content Library

    Get all the essential resources needed for effective technology strategies in the federal landscape.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.