HR and tech managers aren’t on the same page


There is a disconnect between federal human resources officials and information technology leaders over what measures are effective for bringing on the next generation of IT leaders, according to a new report.

While federal HR leaders say they have put succession planning efforts in place, many agency IT operational managers have developed their own internal succession planning amid a perceived lack of HR support, according to “Bridging the Gap in Federal Succession Planning,” which was released Tuesday by the American Council for Technology and Industry Advisory Council.

In addition, all IT operational managers surveyed said their agency’s succession planning program and ongoing HR management strategy were only partially or poorly developed or non-existent. Seventy percent of IT managers said they had not been asked to participate in any agency-level succession planning discussions, ACT-IAC found. “The human capital practitioners felt as though they are delivering succession planning programs as they are required to do by the Office of Personnel Management,” said Susan Grunin, a chair of the group that conducted the study. “However, one of the key results we found is that many IT operational managers are not aware these programs exist in their areas. If they are aware, many find them to be ineffective at producing managers capable of executing agency initiatives.”

The study, based on document research and interviews with federal human capital executives, also said leaders “do not always ensure that their agencies include succession planning as strategic initiatives.” It added: “Internal communications in this area are often ineffective.”

ACT-IAC also found that while some agencies have effective succession planning programs in place, intra-agency succession planning does not consistently take place. The findings come on the heels of another recent report from the Partnership of Public Service that concluded IT issues are a key concern to chief human capital officers, as jobs in science, technology and engineering are considered “mission critical” occupations and agencies have seen hiring delays and a lack of funding to fill vacancies in those areas.

The new report details successful succession planning efforts, for instance at the Commerce Department and NASA. Some successful plans use in-person interviews rather than written applications when making management development choices, since that can more easily indicate potential leaders’ ability to think on their feet and effectively communicate. Other plans conduct “bench strength forecasting” -- looking at current strengths as a way to decide where to invest in resources for leadership development.

ACT-IAC recommended agencies commit to determining why succession planning is not better linked to overall strategic plans. The report also recommended that succession plans include rotational assignments to help foster cross-communication among agency managers, and that training for all new agency leaders include succession planning. OPM also could boost its role in overall succession planning efforts, in part by creating an in-person or virtual education platform and by developing a website with discussion groups, the report said.

(Image via cozyta/

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.