Senator pans federal contract for traffic information site

Sen. Orrin Hatch has accused the Transportation Department of squelching competition for an open-bid contract to collect and post real-time data on traffic conditions. has been under contract with the department since 1999 to deploy "intelligent transportation systems," or ITS, capable of measuring and managing the performance of the nation's highways. By installing digital roadside sensors, will be able to offer citizens free online access to basic traffic data and give agencies archived data in 26 metro areas, including Boston, Detroit, Los Angeles and Tampa, Fla.

The equipment tracks traffic volume, speed and, sometimes, vehicle classification.

Under the 1999 program, has sole discretion over funding for 10 years after each installation. Hatch, R-Utah, has said the contract gave a long-term monopoly on government data collection.

In 2005, he successfully pushed through legislation to level the playing field for small businesses outside the 26 areas covered by the government contract with Under the new law, the follow-on contract, or program extension, allows for state agencies to access funding for ITS without using

But still has the upper hand, Hatch said. In a May 10 letter to Transportation Secretary Mary Peters, he said "the overwhelming majority of the remaining funds available" for the program went to the initial city partnerships with "By continuing its clear bias toward, I believe [Transportation] is stifling competition and ultimately harming consumers, businesses and taxpayers."

Bill Allison, a senior fellow with the Sunlight Foundation, an open-government group, noted in a post to his blog on July 9 that the department's pre-solicitation notice for the follow-on bids uses language that seems to discourage potential bidders from seeking more information on the contract.

For example, the document states: "Freedom of Information Act requests for copies of ['s] contract document are unlikely to be fruitful for organizations wishing to compete for this follow-on project. ... Any attempt, by an offeror submitting a proposal for this follow-on project, to respond to ['s proposal] would almost certainly call into serious question the offeror's grasp of, and commitment to attaining, the technical objectives of this follow-on project."

Transportation Department spokesman Ian Grossman said on Friday that the intent of the language was to separate the follow-on program from the existing program. "We want to be clear [that our] desire is to entertain original proposals and approaches to accomplish the activities requested," he said. "The language reflects that we did not want a cookie-cutter proposal."

DOT replied to Hatch, in a June 22 letter, that, since legislation requires DOT to honor the initial program's contract, "only a limited amount of funding remains uncommitted. ... Because of this lack of funds, only two cities will be able to participate under [the follow-on contract]."

A request for vendor bids for one of those two cities -- Dallas/Forth Worth -- was issued June 22. officials said the company supports the goals of the transportation technology program "and welcomes the opportunity to offer our solutions as the USDOT considers future deployments and expansion."

Hatch is "going to keep fighting for this," Hatch spokesman Peter Carr said on Friday.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.