Senators criticize HHS over security of health data

The Health and Human Services Department drew criticism at a Senate subcommittee hearing Thursday afternoon for rejecting a government auditor's recommendation that HHS craft a comprehensive approach for protecting patient data within a national health information system.

A Jan. 10 report by the Government Accountability Office stated that the department has not yet created a plan for addressing key privacy principles or outlined milestones for integrating the results of HHS' multiple, ongoing privacy-related assessments. GAO officials advised action on those issues.

HHS disagreed with the recommendations in a letter, stating that the department "believes that the tightly scripted milestones GAO recommends would impede our processes and preclude necessary public-private dialogue."

At Thursday's hearing, Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, said he was "surprised" to learn of the department's protest. As businesses, physicians and insurance carriers accelerate their health information technology activities, he said, "I fear that privacy suffers while HHS takes time to decide how to implement privacy protection."

The subcommittee convened to focus on health IT privacy matters related to the Office of Personnel Management's benefits program. It is the country's largest employer-sponsored health insurance program, covering about 8 million federal employees, retirees and their families.

Akaka asked an OPM official if current circumstances could result in an insurance plan developing an electronic health record that would not be protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

Dan Green from OPM's employee and family support policy center said no, adding that he is "convinced" that contract requirements protect enrollees from inappropriate misuse of electronic health information.

Akaka highlighted arguments by witness Mark Rothstein, the chairman of an HHS advisory panel on privacy and confidentiality. Rothstein said private-sector health IT initiatives, like the system being devised by Wal-Mart and other big employers, are "usually not subject to any federal or state regulation." Rothstein, who is also director of the Institute for Bioethics, Health Policy and Law at the University of Louisville, stressed that he was giving his personal views.

Witness Rob Kolodner, the interim HHS national coordinator for health IT, said there are private entities not covered by HIPAA, adding that two HHS advisory bodies have started to consider whether certain entities not subject to the law now should be held accountable.

Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, asked Kolodner if the stopgap spending bill that covers HHS for the rest of fiscal 2007 had harmed the department's progress in safeguarding privacy. Kolodner said his office has not been forced to slow in any way.

In further testimony, Rothstein recommended that Congress "condition continued appropriations" for developing a nationwide health information network on HHS "demonstrating significant progress" in resolving privacy issues.

"The health benefits of electronic health-record networks will never be realized unless the American public has a high degree of trust in network privacy protections," he said. "We can't build the network and then build the trust."

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.