Report calls data-mining expensive, ineffective
- National Journal
- December 12, 2006
- Comments
The statistical likelihood of false positives is so high that the practice "will inevitably waste resources and threaten civil liberties," according to authors Jim Harper, Cato's information policy studies director, and IBM researcher Jeff Jonas.
Data mining was dubbed a key tool in the war on terror after al Qaeda's attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, with federal agencies arguing that comprehensive monitoring of personal data would assist in tracking terrorists. The method relies on "pattern-based analysis" of private data from large numbers of people, but the technology needed to obtain precise results does not exist, the study found.
"Better interagency information-sharing, investigatory legwork, in pursuit of genuine leads, and better training are what the 9/11 story most clearly calls for," Harper and Jonas argued.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.
TSP's G Fund Helps Delay Debt Ceiling
Feds Respond to Oklahoma Tornadoes
Making Government 'Simpler'
OK Senator Wants Aid Offset by Budget Cuts
Boldly Go Where No Fed's Gone Before
Need to Know Memo: Big Data
Research Report: Powering Continuous Monitoring Through Big Data
Addressing the 3 Biggest BYOD Security Threats
Continuous Monitoring As a Service: A Shift in the Way Government Does Business
