OMB publishes high-risk list for IT despite misgivings

The Office of Management and Budget on Thursday published a list of high-risk information technology projects that it previously has resisted sharing for fear that would undermine the document's purpose.

Karen Evans, OMB's administrator of e-government and technology, said at a luncheon Thursday that it is important for people to understand the difference between the high-risk list, which contains a set of high-priority IT projects, and the management watch list, which is a compilation of IT investments that don't meet a series of standards.

"If you're on the high-risk list, it doesn't mean that the project is at risk as in … the agency is failing," Evans said. "It means that there are things that are happening within that particular project … and you need to make sure that senior leadership is aware of it."

Also, the high-risk list, established in August 2005, relates to the execution of specific projects. The management watch list, in contrast, is meant to help oversee the planning of IT investments going through the budget process and was established under the authority of the 1996 Clinger-Cohen Act.

Agency officials can make suggestions for projects that need to be on the high-risk list, but OMB ultimately sets the final list. Evans said the 25 e-government projects and the lines of business initiative to make IT systems more efficient are on the high-risk list because of their complex nature and ripple effect across the government.

"[They] have a lot of risk associated with them, and it takes management at the highest level to ensure their success," Evans said. "I don't want the focus to be, 'I'm on the list. I need to be off the list.' It's not a bad thing to be on the high-risk list."

Evans said earlier this month that if a list of the high-risk projects is published, agencies could edge away from providing "good quality information" in an attempt to avoid being on the list.

The published list will not include justifications explaining why the projects are on it. But Evans said the reasons are fairly obvious, and in some cases, publicly available elsewhere.

The Government Accountability Office called for the publication of the list in a July report, stating that OMB lacked consistent criteria for placing projects on it. The document contains 226 IT projects totaling about $6.4 billion, or 10 percent of the government's proposed $64 billion IT budget for fiscal 2007.

A more structured process for adding and removing projects and a single aggregated list of the high-risk projects is needed to keep Congress up to date on progress, the GAO report stated.

Evans said at the time that an aggregate list is not necessary because the list's intent is for agencies to focus on the execution and performance of the projects. Adopting a consistent process for updating the list limits agencies' flexibility, she said.

At a Sept. 7 Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information and International Security hearing, Evans backed off her previous position on publishing the list, and said her office would compile it for the subcommittee's chairman, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.

A spokesman for Coburn said the subcommittee received the information Thursday and that the senator is pleased OMB is putting the list online.

Stay up-to-date with federal news alerts and analysis — Sign up for GovExec's email newsletters.
Close [ x ] More from GovExec

Thank you for subscribing to newsletters from
We think these reports might interest you:

  • Sponsored by G Suite

    Cross-Agency Teamwork, Anytime and Anywhere

    Dan McCrae, director of IT service delivery division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

  • Data-Centric Security vs. Database-Level Security

    Database-level encryption had its origins in the 1990s and early 2000s in response to very basic risks which largely revolved around the theft of servers, backup tapes and other physical-layer assets. As noted in Verizon’s 2014, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)1, threats today are far more advanced and dangerous.

  • Sponsored by One Identity

    One Nation Under Guard: Securing User Identities Across State and Local Government

    In 2016, the government can expect even more sophisticated threats on the horizon, making it all the more imperative that agencies enforce proper identity and access management (IAM) practices. In order to better measure the current state of IAM at the state and local level, Government Business Council (GBC) conducted an in-depth research study of state and local employees.

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    The Next Federal Evolution of Cloud

    This GBC report explains the evolution of cloud computing in federal government, and provides an outlook for the future of the cloud in government IT.

  • Sponsored by LTC Partners, administrators of the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

    Approaching the Brink of Federal Retirement

    Approximately 10,000 baby boomers are reaching retirement age per day, and a growing number of federal employees are preparing themselves for the next chapter of their lives. Learn how to tackle the challenges that today's workforce faces in laying the groundwork for a smooth and secure retirement.

  • Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Cyber Defense 101: Arming the Next Generation of Government Employees

    Read this issue brief to learn about the sector's most potent challenges in the new cyber landscape and how government organizations are building a robust, threat-aware infrastructure

  • Sponsored by Aquilent

    GBC Issue Brief: Cultivating Digital Services in the Federal Landscape

    Read this GBC issue brief to learn more about the current state of digital services in the government, and how key players are pushing enhancements towards a user-centric approach.


When you download a report, your information may be shared with the underwriters of that document.